期刊文献+

基于结构方程的拥挤收费公众可接受性模型 被引量:7

Public acceptability model of congestion pricing based on structural equation model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了从心理学的角度解释影响拥挤收费公众可接受性的原因,揭示心理因素对可接受性的影响规律.以心理学理论为基础,选择社会规范、问题感知、个人规范、感知行为控制、行为意愿、感知有效、感知公平、感知自由8个心理因素作为研究变量,构建了公众可接受性的心理因素结构模型;根据模型的要求,开发了心理因素量表,并利用该量表对单一拥挤收费措施和加入了改善公交的组合措施进行了调查;利用调查的897个小汽车用户样本对结构模型进行了拟合与估计.结果表明:在可接受性的解释因素上两个措施没有显著的不同,感知公平、感知自由、个人规范、感知行为控制对可接受性有直接影响;影响效果分析表明感知公平和感知自由是影响公众可接受性的关键因子.提高公平性或增加可替代的出行方式有助于提高拥挤收费的公众可接受性. To explain the reasons of influencing public acceptability of congestion pricing from psychological point of view,and reveal the influence law of psychological factors on acceptability,the structural equation model of public acceptability is built with psychological factors social norm,problem perception,personal norm,perceived behavioral control,behavioral intention,perceived effectiveness,equity and freedom.A scale is developed to measure these psychological factors.Single congestion pricing policy and combined measure of congestion pricing to improve transit are investigated by the scale.The default structural model is fitted and estimated by 897 samples of car user.The results show that the explanatory factors for acceptability are not significantly different between two measures,perceived fairness,freedom,personal norm and perceived behavioral control have direct impact on acceptability.The perceived fairness and freedom are the key factors to affect the public acceptability.The model results may provide a basis for managers to increase the acceptability of congestion pricing policy.
作者 孙祥龙 陆建
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期140-144,共5页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2011AA110302) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划(cxzz-0167)
关键词 拥挤收费 公众可接受性 结构方程模型 关键影响因子 congestion pricing public acceptability structural equation model key influence factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1GARLING T, SCHUITEMA G. Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility [ J ]. Journal of Social Issues, 2007, 63(1) : 139 - 153.
  • 2SCHADE J, SCHLAG B. Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies [ J ]. Transportation Research Part F, 2003, 6(2), 45 -61.
  • 3SCHUITEMA G, STEG L, ROTHENGAITER J A. The acceptability, personal outcome expectations, and expected effects of transport pricing policies [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(4), 587-593.
  • 4SCHWARTZ S. Elicitation of moral obligation and self- sacrificing behavior:an experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15 (4) : 283 -93.
  • 5AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision process, 1991, 50(2) : 179 -211.
  • 6ERIKSSON L, GARVILL J, NORDLUND A M. Acceptability of travel demand management measures: the importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2006, 26( 1): 15-26.
  • 7ERIKSSON L,GARVILL J,NORDLUND A M. Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: the importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 2008, 42(8), 1117-1128.
  • 8吴明隆.结构方程模型:Amos的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:212-262.
  • 9COOLS M, BRIJS K, TORMANS H, et al. The sociocognitive links between road pricing acceptability and changes in travel behavior [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 2011,45 (8), 778 - 779.
  • 10BAMBERG S, ROLLE D. Determinants of people' s acceptability of pricing measures : replication and extension of a causal model [ C]//SCHADE J, SCHLAG B. Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Oxford: Elsevier, 2003 : 235 - 248.

共引文献59

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部