期刊文献+

肩锁与喙锁关节植入物内固定治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效比较的Meta分析 被引量:3

Curative effects of acromioclavicular fixation versus coracoclavicular fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocations through Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:有关肩锁关节脱位治疗的报道很多,虽然采用的手术方式和固定材料存在差异,但总体而言可分为两大类,即肩锁固定和喙锁固定。究竟何种方式疗效更佳,目前还存在很大的争议。目的:应用Meta分析的方法对比肩锁固定和喙锁固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效。方法:计算机检索Pubmed(1950年1月至2011年10月)、EMBASE(1966年1月至2011年10月)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(1989年1月至2011年10月)、万方数据库(1982年1月至2011年10月)及中国知网数据库(1979年1月至2011年10月)中有关比较肩锁固定和喙锁固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的随机对照试验,按照文中所述纳入标准搜集后进行对比,利用RevMan5.0软件进行异质性分析及Meta分析,绘制森林图。结果与结论:共9篇文章(473例患者,473侧肩锁关节)符合纳入标准。Meta分析结果显示,肩锁固定与喙锁固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的固定后肩关节功能评分差异无显著性意义,两者在固定后上肢肌力、肩关节活动度、固定后再次脱位率等指标变化上差异亦无显著性意义。因此临床上肩锁关节脱位的治疗不强求采用肩锁固定或是喙锁固定,可根据患者病情、所在医院的条件及术者对不同手术方法的熟悉程度等条件来选择合适的固定方式。 BACKGROUND:A lot of reports focus on the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations with many differences on the methods and implants.The methods for treatment of the acromioclavicular joint dislocations which used more often in clinic are acromioclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular fixation.There exists great controversy on which method is better.OBJECTIVE:To compare the curative effects between acromioclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocations through Meta-analysis.METHODS:Related randomized controlled trials on acromioclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocations were searched in PubMed database(1950-01/2011-10),EMBASE database(1966-01/2011-10),CNKI database(1979-01/2011-10),Wanfang database(1982-01/2011-10) and VIP database(1989-01/2011-10).The articles were collected according to the inclusion criteria and then compared.Heterogeneity analysis and Meta-analysis were performed using RevMan5.0 software,and then the forest graph was made.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Nine articles involving 473 patients and 473 acromioclavicular joints were accepted in our Meta-analysis.There were no significant differences in curative effect score,strength of upper limbs,shoulder movement,re-dislocations rate between acromioclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular fixation.Therefore,the clinical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation can not only use the acromioclavicular fixed or coracoclavicular fixation,doctors should choose the best method according to the patients' condition,hospital conditions and the surgery proficiency of the doctor.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第48期8997-9001,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 南京军区医学科研重点课题(08Z004)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献71

共引文献162

同被引文献43

  • 1陆伟,王大平,朱伟民,欧阳侃,柳海峰,彭亮权,李皓,冯文哲.关节镜下四骨道双束固定治疗急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(3):157-162. 被引量:6
  • 2Warth R J, Martetschlger F, Gaskill TR, et al. Acromioclavicular joint separations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6(1 ):71-78.
  • 3Ha AS, Petscavage-Thomas JM, Tagoylo GH. Acremioclavicular joint: the other joint in the shoulder. A JR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):375-385.
  • 4Kim AC, Matcuk G, Patel D, et al. Acromioclavicular joint injuries and reconstructions: a review of expected imaging findings and potential complications. Emerg Radiol. 2012; 19(5):399-413.
  • 5Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):387-397.
  • 6Willimon SC, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Phys Sportsmed 2011 ;39(1 ):116-122.
  • 7Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, et al. Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(1):33-39.
  • 8Smith TO, Chester R, Pearse EO, et al. Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 ;12(1 ): 19-27.
  • 9Trainer G, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD. Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Clin J Sport Med. 2008; 18(2): 162-166.
  • 10Gstettner C, Taubor M, Hitzl W, et al. Rockwood type III acremioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):220-225.

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部