刑事政策考量下的刑法教义学应何去何从——本体论亦或规范论?

Where Should Criminal Law Dogmatics go Given the Criminal Policy——The Ontological Theory or the Normative Theory?

刑事政策和刑法教义学究竟有怎样的关系,日益引起学者的关注。刑法教义学是国家对刑事政策目的的反应,现代民主法治国家应选择与之相适应的刑事政策和刑法教义学,德国刑法教义学以Roxin为代表的功能论因提出将刑事政策纳入刑法教义学体系中而备受推崇,与之相对应的Welzel目的行为论并非忽略了刑事政策,其论证过程所基于的本体论更具限制国家刑罚权的功能,故应在本体论基础上发现能更好地保障人权的理性的刑事政策和刑法教义学。

What kind of relationship criminal policy and criminal law dogmatics exactly have increasingly at- tracts the attention of scholars. Criminal law dogmatics is the state＇ s reaction to the purpose of the criminal policy. The modem democratic state under the rule of law should select a suitable criminal policy and criminal law dogmatics. The German criminal law dogmatics of Roxin＇ s functional theory has great reputation because it puts the criminal policy into the criminal law dogmatic system. Correspondingly the Welzel＇ s dogmatics also doesn＇ t ignore the criminal policy. And the ontology methodology, which it＇ s based on, is more functional to limit the state＇ s power of punishment. So it should be on the basis of ontology to have research on a rational criminal policy and criminal law dogmatics ,which can protect human fights better.