期刊文献+

Optimal arrangement of viscoelastic dampers for seismic control of adjacent shear-type structures 被引量:3

Optimal arrangement of viscoelastic dampers for seismic control of adjacent shear-type structures
原文传递
导出
摘要 The optimal arrangement of viscoelastic dampers (VEDs) used to link two adjacent shear-type structures under seismic excitation was investigated. A two-step optimal design method is proposed. First, optimal parameter expressions of the Kelvin model are used to calculate the optimal stiffness and damping coefficient of the VEDs. Then, using the two-step optimal design method, taking the quadratic performance index as the optimization objective, the optimal arrangement of the dampers is determined. General rules about the optimal arrangement of the VEDs were obtained. The results show that the placement of only one damper between two adjacent shear-type structures should be avoided; if more than one damper is used, they should be distributed on the top and lower floors of the structures. Optimization of the number of dampers had little effect on response reduction. The most important factor was the optimization of the placement of the dampers. Through comparative study, for buildings of equal and unequal heights, the optimal parameters of dampers from parametric studies were shown to match the theoretical results for different numbers and placements of dampers. The level of response reduction was shown to be sensitive to the damping coefficient of the dampers. The optimal arrangement of viscoelastic dampers (VEDs) used to link two adjacent shear-type structures under seismic excitation was investigated. A two-step optimal design method is proposed. First, optimal parameter expressions of the Kelvin model are used to calculate the optimal stiffness and damping coefficient of the VEDs. Then, using the two-step optimal design method, taking the quadratic performance index as the optimization objective, the optimal arrangement of the dampers is determined. General rules about the optimal arrangement of the VEDs were obtained. The results show that the placement of only one damper between two adjacent shear-type structures should be avoided; if more than one damper is used, they should be dis- tributed on the top and lower floors of the structures. Optimization of the number of dampers had little effect on response reduction The most important factor was the optimization of the placement of the dampers. Through comparative study, for buildings of equal and unequal heights, the optimal parameters of dampers from parametric studies were shown to match the theoretical results for different numbers and placements of dampers. The level of response reduction was shown to be sensitive to the damping coefficient of the dampers.
出处 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A(Applied Physics & Engineering)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2013年第1期47-60,共14页 浙江大学学报(英文版)A辑(应用物理与工程)
基金 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51178203) the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No. 50925828)
关键词 Adjacent shear-type structures Viscoelastic damper (VED) Optimal arrangement Seismic response 英文摘要 编辑工作 优秀论文 医学期刊
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Abdullah, M.M., Hanif, J.H., Richardson, A., Sobanjo, J., 2001. Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(8): 1185-1201. [doi:lO.1002/eqe.58].
  • 2Basili, M., De Angelis, M., 2007. Optimal passive control of adjacent structures interconnected with nonlinear hyster- etic devices. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 301(1-2): 106-125. [doi: a 0.1016/j.jsv.2006.09.027].
  • 3Bharti, S.D., Dumne, S.M., Shrimali, M.K., 2010. Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers. Engineering Structures, 32(8):2122-2133. [doi:l 0.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.015].
  • 4Bhaskararao, A.V., Jangid, R.S., 2006a. Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with friction dampers. Bul- letin of Earthquake Engineering, 4(1):43-64. [doi:10. 1007Is10518-005-5410-1 ].
  • 5Bhaskararao, A.V., Jangid, R.S., 2006b. Seismic analysis of structures connected with friction dampers. Engineering Structures, 28(5):690-703. Idol: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005. 09.020].
  • 6Bhaskararao, A.V., Jangid, R.S., 2006c. Harmonic response of adjacent structures connected with a friction damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292(3-5):710-725. [doi: 10.10161j.jsv.2005.08.029d].
  • 7Clough, R., Penzien, J., 2004. Dynamics of Structures (2rd Edition). Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, Cali- fornia, USA.
  • 8Ge, D.D., Zhu, H.P., Wang, D.S., Huang, M.S., 2010. Seismic response analysis of damper-connected adjacent structures with stochastic parameters. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 11(6): 402-414, [doi:10.1631/jzus.A0900345].
  • 9Kasai, K., Maison, B.F., 1997. Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Engineering Structures, 19(3):195-207. [doi:10.1016190141-0296(96) 00082-X].
  • 10Kim, J., Ryu, J., Chung, L., 2006. Seismic performance of structures connecting by viscoelastic dampers. Engineer- ing Structures, 28(2):183-195. [doi:10.1016/j.engstruet. 2005.05.014].

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部