关于《九章筭术》之文津阁本

On the Wenjin Version of the Jiuzhang Suanshu

本文通过《九章筭术》之四库文津阁本与文渊阁本、聚珍版的校雠,发现文津阁本的抄录比文渊阁本认真得多,其舛误甚至比聚珍版还少;文津阁本是依据《九章筭术》戴震辑录校勘本的正本抄录的,应该比文渊阁本早;文渊阁本不是根据戴震辑录校勘本的正本抄录的,而是根据其副本抄录的;笔者准备汇校《九章筭术》的过程中,由聚珍版与四库本恢复《九章筭术》的《永乐大典》戴震辑录本是正确的,但是使用文渊阁本则有失偏颇,而应以四库文津阁本为主,以聚珍版、文渊阁本参校对校恢复之,从而为校勘《九章筭术》提供更准确的底本。

After comparing the version of the Jiuzhang suanshu ）九章筭术 （ Nine Chapters on the Art of Mathematics） in the Siku quanshu 四库全书 （A Complete Collection of the Four Branches of Literature） preserved in the Wenjin Library 文津阁 with that housed in the Wenyuan Library 文渊阁 and the edition of Juzhen 聚珍版, this paper believes that the Wenjin version is much better than the Wenyuan version, and even has fewer mistakes than the edition of the Juzhen. The paper also ar- gues that the Wenjin version was directly copied from the progenitor of the collated texts of the Ji- uzhang suanshu by Dai Zhen 戴震, and it is earlier than the Wenyuan version, which was not direct- ly copied from the progenitor but from its inferior copy. The approach the author of this paper had used in collating the Yongle dadian ~.~：（ The Yongle Encyclopedia） version of the Jiuzhang su- anshu by using the Juzhen version and the Siku versions is correct, but he has misused the Wenyuan version. A more accurate version of the Jiuzhang suanshu would result from using primarily the Wen- fin version checked against both the Juzhen and the Wenyuan versions.