3[5]Michael D. McGinnis and Vincent Ostrom: Democratic Transformations: From the Struggle for Democracy to Self -governance? Presented at Workshop on the Workshop 2, Bloomington, Indiana, June 9- 13, 1999; Vincent Ostrom: The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville's Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
4Ram,R.Wagner' s Hypothesis in Time-series and Cross-section Perspectives:Evidence from“Real”Data for115Countries[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1987,69(2):194—204.
5Thornton J.Cointegration,Causality and Wagner' s Law in 19th Century Europe[J].Applied Economics Letters,1999,6(7):413—416.
6Wagner,R.E.,Weber,W.E.Wagner' s Law,Fiscal Institutions,and The Growth of Government[J].National Tax Journal,1977,30(1):59—68.
7Grier,K.,Tullock,G.An Empirical Analysis of Cross-national Economic Growth,1950-1980[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1987,24(2):259—276.
8Abizadeh,S.,Gray,J.Wagner' s Law:A Pooled Time-series,Cross-section Comparison[J].National Tax Journal,1985,38(2):209—218.
9Afxentiou,P.C.,Serletis,A.Government Expenditures in The European Union:Do They Converge or Follow Wagner' s Law?[J].International Economic Journal,1996,10(3):33—47.
10Brennan,G.,Buchanan,J.M.The Power to Tax:Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1980.
