解放的辩证法:后马克思主义的政治乌托邦及其批判

Dialectics of Emancipation: Introduction and Critique to Post-Marxist Political Utopia

拉克劳和齐泽克是当代享有世界声誉的后马克思主义思想家。拉克劳和齐泽克都提出了一种解放话语,试图取代马克思主义的实践总体的辩证法。但二者对解放话语的理解却有着根本的差异。在拉克劳看来,代替马克思主义的实践辩证法的是霸权逻辑,而在齐泽克看来,替代马克思主义哲学的社会总体实践则是激进行动。本文通过对拉克劳的霸权辩证法和齐泽克的行动辩证法的阐释和解读,试图指明二者之间的相同与差异,并在此基础上,对后马克思主义的政治乌托邦进行批判。

Laclau and Zizek are contemporary post-Marxist thinkers who enjoy worldwide reputation. While they both propose a discourse of emancipation and attempt to replace Marxist dialectics of overall practice, their understanding of the emancipation discourse shows fundamental differences. For Laclau it is the logic of hegemony that replaces Marxist dialectics; for Zizek, it is the radical act that replaces it. This paper intends to explain and interpret Laclau＇s logic of hegemony and Zizek＇s dialectics of act to discuss their common ideas and differences. On the basis of this discussion critique to the political utopia of post-Marxism is presented.