期刊文献+

莱西科学公正性理论价值探析 被引量:2

An Analysis of Hugh Lacey's Value of Scientific Impartiality
原文传递
导出
摘要 在莱西的科学价值中立的三要素中,公正性是其中的核心。莱西通过对公正性与认知价值、与社会价值之关系的考察,确立了公正性的理论基础,强调了科学公正性中"善"的意义,批判了"唯物主义战略"的思想。但在公正性上,由于他缺乏对"唯物主义战略"产生原因的批判,也就表现出他对技术工具性之默认的理论局限性以及自身理论视域的狭隘性。 Impartiality is the core part of Hugh Lacey's value neutrality of science which containing three elements. By examining the relationship between impartiality and cognitive value, as well as the relationship with social value, Hugh Lacey not only established the theoretical basis of impartiality, but also criticized the thought of "materialist strategies" ~ However, he did not criticize the reason for the "materialist strategies", so it showed the theory limitation of acquiesce in tech-instrumentalism, as well as the parochialism of his own theory perspective in the course of criticism.
作者 许斗斗
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期138-144,共7页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 福建省社会科学规划项目"技术社会的责任价值研究"(2012B158)
关键词 莱西 公正性 科学价值 认知价值 Hugh Lacey impartiality scientific value cognitive value
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Hugh Lacey. Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London and New York.. Routledge, 1999.
  • 2李建会,刘松涛.在理想与现实之间--赖西科学价值中立论研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2008,24(11):1-6. 被引量:5
  • 3Hugh Lacey. "Scientific Understanding and the Control of Nature" . Science g Education, 1999 (8) .
  • 4Hugh Laeey. Impartiality, Neutrality andAutonomy: Three Components of the Idea that Science is Value Free. Presented at the conference. "Value Free Science: Illusion or Ideal?" Center for Ethics and Values in the Sciences. University of Alabama at Birmingham, February 23--25, 2001.
  • 5T.内格尔,姚大志.什么是客观性?[J].世界哲学,2003(3):85-90. 被引量:22
  • 6约翰·齐曼:《可靠的知识》,北京,商务印书馆,2003.
  • 7拉里·劳丹:《进步及其问题--科学增长理论刍议》,上海,上海译文出版社,1991.
  • 8汉斯·约纳斯:《技术、医学和伦理学》,上海,上海译文出版社,2008.
  • 9胡塞尔.《欧洲科学危机和超验现象学》,张庆熊译,上海:上海译文出版社,1988年,第6-7页.
  • 10约翰·齐曼:《真科学》,上海,上海科技教育出版社,2002.

二级参考文献3

  • 1.Mary Tiles.Review[].British Journal for Philosophy ofScience.2000
  • 2Hugh Lacey.Is Science Value Free?Values and ScientificUnderstanding[]..1999
  • 3Heather Douglas.Book Review[].Philosophy of Science.2002

共引文献41

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部