期刊文献+

论“技术—伦理实践”在场的合法性——对荷兰学派技术哲学研究的一种思考 被引量:4

On the Legitimacy of "Technology-ethics Practice"——A Reflection of the Studies on Technology Philosophy of the Dutch School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实践在其在场之初就内蕴伦理地实践和技术地实践双重内涵,它在历经唯伦理道德地实践与唯技术地实践的分野之后,在当下这个技术社会中,技术人工物的设计、制造与使用促逼着实践内涵的自我复归。以技术哲学的荷兰学派的研究成果与研究范式为例,当前技术哲学的研究进路可以用"技术—伦理实践"来概述,而这恰恰是对实践内涵自我复归的一种生动表达。基于此点指认,技术哲学的荷兰学派乃至国际技术哲学界正行进在技术哲学的实践逻辑之路上。 When praxis came into being, it consisted of dual connotations--ethical practice and technical practice. Undergoing the dividing phases between exclusively ethical practice and exclusively technical practice, praxis has had its two connotations reunified by designing, making and using technical artifacts in the contemporary technological society. Taking for example the Dutch School's research findings and research paradigms of technology philosophy, it was found that "technology- ethics practice" serves to summarize the current research achievements of technology philosophy, which accurately expresses the return of praxis' connotations. Based on this point, the Dutch School and even the international circle of technical philosophy are walking on the road of the logics of praxis.
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期14-18,共5页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(JGG101501)
关键词 实践 “技术-伦理实践” 伦理地实践 技术地实践 经验转向 praxis "technology-ethics practice" ethical practice technical practice empirical turn
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献45

  • 1阴训法,陈凡.论“技术人工物”的三重性[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(7):28-31. 被引量:16
  • 2赵克.会聚技术及其社会审视[J].科学学研究,2007,25(3):430-434. 被引量:17
  • 3Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers. Reply to Critics[J], Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Tech- nology,2002, 6 (2): 34-43.
  • 4Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers. The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts-Presentation of a new Research Pro- gramme[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology,2002, 6 (2), 4-8.
  • 5Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meljers (eds.). Philosophy of Technical Artifacts[M]. Joint Delft-Eindhoven Research Programme 2005-2010.
  • 6Sven Ove Hansson (Guest Editor). Understanding Techno logical Function: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Dual Nature Programme[J]. Techne : Journal of the Socie-ty for Philosophy and Technology,2002,6 (2):1-3.
  • 7Carl Mitcham. Do Artifacts have Dual Natures? Two Points of Commentary on the Delft Project[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 2002, 6 (2):9-12.
  • 8Kroes P A and A W M Meijers, eds. Introduction: The Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2006, vol. 37, issuel:1-4.
  • 9Davis Baird. Thing Knowledge -Function and Truth[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Tech- nology,2002, 6 (2) :13-27.
  • 10Daniel Rothbart. The Dual Nature of Chemical Substance[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology,2002, 6 (2) :28- 33.

共引文献611

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部