期刊文献+

从醉驾入罪看网络舆情与立法理性的冲突 被引量:2

The Conflict Between Network Public Opinion and the Rationality of Legislation from the Conviction of Drunk Driving
下载PDF
导出
摘要 醉驾入罪是网络舆情促推的结果,并非立法理性的必然体现。现行醉驾入罪的法律规定与刑法价值理念相冲突。应当取消醉驾入罪,或者将一般醉驾行为回归《道路交通安全法》等行政法调整,要么提高危险驾驶罪的法定刑,将所有醉驾行为构成犯罪的一律以危险驾驶罪定罪,并根据情节或后果规定不同档次的法定刑。 Drunk driving conviction was the result of network public opinion promotion,not an inevitable reflection of rational legislation.Current law on drunk driving conviction conflicts with the concept of criminal law.So drunk driving conviction should either be eliminated and ordinary drunk driving behavior should be adjusted by the Road Traffic Safety Law,or improve the statutory criminal offence of dangerous driving and all drunk driving behavior be considered as a crime of dangerous driving offence conviction and different grades of statutory penalty should be sentenced in accordance with the circumstances or consequences.
作者 徐跃飞
机构地区 湖南警察学院
出处 《湖南警察学院学报》 2012年第5期5-8,共4页 Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词 醉驾 网络舆情 立法 理性 drunk driving network public opinion legislation rational
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1台·林山田.经济犯罪与经济刑法[M].台北:台湾三民书局,1981.102.
  • 2陈冰.醉驾入刑:从立法争议到执法争论[J].新民周刊,2011,(21).
  • 3王常青,谢金桐,孙修廷.市区严查酒驾一年因酒事故下降62.5%[N].襄樊晚报,2010-08-17.
  • 4[日]大谷实.刑事政策学[M].黎宏译.北京:法律出版社,2000.85.
  • 5马克昌.犯罪通论[M].武汉大学出版社,2001-1(3):387.

共引文献86

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部