“非数额型盗窃”入罪的学理反思

The Theoretical Reflection on the Criminalation of Larceny without Amount

《刑法修正案八》将入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃以"定性不定量"的模式单独入罪,其立法原意值得反思。从全法体系的角度",违法与犯罪"依旧是二元的",非数额型盗窃罪"稀释着刑法谦抑性;从法益论的角度,一切盗窃行为侵犯的仍然是值得刑法保护的财产权,"非数额型盗窃罪"消褪着法益关联性。为了防备刑法介入的扩大化,司法者应当客观地、实质地解读这一规范,在实体与程序的一体化运行中为其犯罪圈的膨胀层层设防。

The Eighth Amendment of Criminal Law has criminalized burglary,stealing with weapon,pickpocketing in a form of only requring qualitative analysis.This legislative intent deserves much reflection.From the angle of the whole law systems,an ordinary illegal act is obviously different from a criminal act,and therefore larceny without amount strikes against the modestly restraining spirit of criminal law;from the angle of rechtsgut,all larceny acts still infringe others＇ property rights,and consequently the larceny without amount makes the relevance of property rechtsgut fade away.In order to guard against the extensification of criminal law＇s intervention,judicators must read the rule in an objective and material way and should set up defenses in both substantial stage and procedural stage.