期刊文献+

公共品实验中奖惩机制效应的研究 被引量:1

A Study of Effect of Reward and Punishment Mechanisms in Public Goods Experiment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用经济学实验的方法,以公共品自愿捐赠机制为基础,考察奖励机制与惩罚机制效应的对称性和奖惩联合机制对公共品自愿捐赠的影响.实验发现,奖励机制与惩罚机制的效应不对称;奖惩联合机制能较有效地提供公共品.实验结论对解决社会两难问题、协调群体利益以及构建和谐社会具有一定的现实指导意义. This paper adopts experimental method, based on the voluntary contribution mechanism, to study the symmetries of effect of reward mechanism and punishment mechanism and the impact of reward and punishment mechanism on public goods contribution. The experiment find that there is an asymmetrical effect between reward and punishment mechanism, and the joint of reward and punishment can improve the public goods contribution effectively. The results has a certain realistic guiding significance for easing the social dilemma, coordinating groups' interests and building a harmonious society.
作者 刘建华
出处 《漳州师范学院学报(自然科学版)》 2012年第4期106-110,共5页 Journal of ZhangZhou Teachers College(Natural Science)
基金 国家社科基金项目(10BJL027) 福建省社会科学规划项目(2011C047)
关键词 公共品 社会两难 自愿捐赠机制 奖惩机制 public goods social dilemma VCM reward and punishment mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1965:138-139.
  • 2Isaac,R.M.,Walker,J.M.&Thomas,S., Divergent Evidence on Free Riding:An Experimental Examination of PossibleExpIanations [J]. Public Choice, 1984,(43): 113-149.
  • 3Isaac,R.M.,McCue,K. and Plott’C.,Public Goods Provision in and Experimental Environment[J]. Journal of Public Economics,1985,(26): 51-74.
  • 4Fehr’E.&S.Gather., Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments [J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90(4):980-994.
  • 5Carpenter. When in Rome: Conformity and the provision of public goods[J]. Journal of Socio' Economics, 2004,(33): 395- 408.
  • 6Page,T.,L.Putterman & B.UneL Voluntary association in public goods experiments[J]. Economic Journal, 2005,(115): 1032 -1053.
  • 7Anderson,C.& L.Putterman. Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand for punishment in the voluntary contributionmechanism[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2006, 54 (1): 1-24.
  • 8马剑虹,刘满霞.社会两难行为理性特点的实验分析[J].心理科学,2006,29(2):290-293. 被引量:7
  • 9陈欣,叶浩生.两难中合作行为研究的回顾和展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):743-748. 被引量:21
  • 10Messick D.M,Tenbrunsel A.E., 1999,Sanctioning Systems,Decision Frames and Cooperation[J], Administrative ScienceQuarterly,44: 123-136.

二级参考文献38

共引文献26

同被引文献17

  • 1黄湛冰,万迪昉.惩罚在长期激励中的成本优势分析[J].管理科学,2005,18(5):17-20. 被引量:8
  • 2董志强,严太华.监察合谋:惩罚、激励与合谋防范[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(3):94-97. 被引量:19
  • 3谢识予,孙碧波,朱弘鑫,筒井义郎,秦劼,万军民.两次风险态度实验研究及其比较分析[J].金融研究,2007(11A):57-66. 被引量:23
  • 4Ishiguro S, Itoh H. Moral hazard and renegotiation with multiple agents l-J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2001,68(1) : 1:20.
  • 5Williamson O E. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations I-J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1981,83 : 539: 577.
  • 6Ting S-C, Chen C-N. An integrated study of entrepreneurs: opportunism I-J]. Journal of Business :-Industrial Marketing, 2007, 22(5):322:335.
  • 7Laffont J J, Tirole J. Cost padding, auditing and collusion [J3. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 1992:205:226.
  • 8Tirole. Hierarchies and bureaucracies on the role of collusion in organizations I-J 7. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 1986,2(3) : 181:214.
  • 9Baimen, Nagarajan. Collusion in auditing[JT. Journal of Accounting Research, 1991,29.
  • 10Chen Z J, Chiou J Y. Asymmetric mechanism with discrimination to prevent collusion I-Z]. IDEI Toulouse, 2002.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部