期刊文献+

词义转喻性及隐喻性扩展对ESL词汇认知的启示——以一词多义face义项分析为例

On the Inspiration of Metonymy and Metaphor in ESL Vocabulary Cognition and Teaching——Based on the Analysis of Meaning Items of"Face"as a Polysemy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转喻和隐喻是词义扩展的重要方式,转喻是以邻近关系为基础的以部分代整体,隐喻是以事物相似性为基础。以多义词"face"为例,从认知转喻和隐喻的思维角度分析ESL的词汇认知,通过对转喻和隐喻认知理论的简要阐述,结合face这个多义词的词典义项分析和语境义项分析,阐明了其对于ESL词汇认知和教学的指导作用。 Metonymy and Metaphor are two major types of word meaning extension. Metonymical thinking is based on contiguity and metaphorical thinking is based on similarity. Through the brief introduction of Metonymy and Metaphor, and the analysis of typical polysemy "face" of its meaning items in dictionary and sentences, this paper devotes to showing the great influence of Metonymy and Metaphor in ESL vocabulary cognition and thus in ESL teaching.
出处 《怀化学院学报》 2012年第12期85-87,共3页 Journal of Huaihua University
基金 湖南省教育厅课题"原型范畴理论观照下的英语词汇认知研究" 项目编号:09C764
关键词 词义扩展 认知 一词多义 meaning extension cognition polysemy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Taylor. J. R. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2004.
  • 2de Saussure F. Course in General Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2003.
  • 3Leech,J.N.语义学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000:318.
  • 4王晓莹.转喻在英语习语中的应用[J].科教文汇,2011(2):109-111. 被引量:1
  • 5Lakoff, G. & M Johnson. Metaphors We Live by [ M]. New York: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 6李清华.语言测试之效度理论发展五十年[J].现代外语,2006,29(1):87-95. 被引量:93
  • 7Goossens L. Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action, 2002.
  • 8Dirven R. Metonymy and metaphor: Different Mental Strategies of Conception [A]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002.

二级参考文献52

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量:718
  • 2Linn, R. L. 1997. Evaluating the validity of assessments: The consequences of use [J]. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice 16 (2) : 14-16.
  • 3Messick, S. 1988. The once and future issues of validity: assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement [A]. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (eds.). Test Validity [C]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun.
  • 4Messick, S. 1989. Validity [A]. In R. L. Linn (ed.). Educational Measurement (3rd edition) [C]. New York : Macmillan.
  • 5Messick, S. 1994. The interplay of evidence and consequence in the validation of performance assessments [J]. Educational Researcher 23 (2) :13-23
  • 6Messick, S. 1995. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person's responses and performance as scientific inquiry into scoring meaning [J]. American Psychologist 9: 741-49.
  • 7Messick, S. 1996. Validity and washback in language testing [J]. Language Testing 13 (3): 241-56.
  • 8Moss, P. A. 1992. Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment [J]. Review of Educational Research 62: 229-258.
  • 9Oiler, J. W. 1979. Language Tests at School [M]. London : Longman.
  • 10Qi, Luxia. 2005. Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test [J]. Language Testing 22 (2): 142-173.

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部