摘要
股东代表仲裁机制是公司法律研究的新课题。相对于股东代表诉讼制度的强制性,股东代表仲裁机制在维护公司和中小股东的合法权益方面更能体现当事人之间的意识自治,提升程序效率。总体上,契约的相对性属性与仲裁协议的效力扩展之间并不冲突,但作为公司股东权益实现的有效手段,仲裁代表的主体资格、仲裁协议的扩展效力、仲裁程序中的举证责任和仲裁代表的行为责任规则等问题也亟待明确。
The corporate shareholder representative arbitration mechanism is a new topic of corporate law research. Comparing with the coerciveness of shareholder representative litigation system, it can better reflect consciousness autonomy between parties, and promote procedure efficiency on safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of corporations and minority shareholders. In general, there is no conflict between the extension of contract relative properties and effectiveness of arbitration agreement, but as an effective means to achieve the interests of shareholders, it is also necessary to make clear about the main qualification of arbitration representatives, extension effectiveness of arbitration agreement, the burden of proof in arbitration procedure, behavioral liability rules of arbitration representatives and so on.
出处
《闽西职业技术学院学报》
2012年第4期36-39,共4页
Journal of Minxi Vocational and Technical College
关键词
股东代表仲裁
股东权益
仲裁协议
shareholder representative arbitration
interests of shareholders
arbitrationagreement