期刊文献+

谷胱甘肽硫转移酶P1基因DNA甲基化、mRNA和蛋白表达与燃煤污染型地方性砷中毒关系探讨 被引量:2

Relationship of DNA methylation, mRNA transcription and protein expression of glutathione-S-transferases- P1 gene and coal-pollution-borne endemic arsenism
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨谷胱甘肽硫转移酶P1(GSTPl)基因启动子区DNA甲基化、mRNA和蛋白表达与砷中毒的关系。方法123例砷中毒患者来自贵州省兴仁县交乐村燃煤污染型地方性砷中毒病区,按地方性砷中毒诊断标准(WS/T211-2001),其中轻度42例、中度41例,重度40例。在距病区约13km的非砷暴露村.选择47例正常健康人作为对照。根据知情同意的原则,采集被调查者的外周血,用PCR法检测外周血GSTPl基因启动子区DNA甲基化,用荧光实时定量PCR法检测GSTPlmRNA表达。取自愿手术治疗的53例砷中毒患者的皮肤病理标本,其中一般病变28例、癌前病变20例、癌变5例,以病理学诊断无异常的15例非肿瘤手术患者的皮肤组织为对照组。采用免疫组织化学(IHC)法检测皮肤组织中GSTPl蛋白的表达。结果在按病情分组中,外周血GSTPl基因DNA甲基化阳性率轻(28.57%,12/42)、中(57.10%,23/41)、重度(65.00%。26/40)砷中毒组与对照组(6.38%,3/47)比较差异有统计学意义(x。值分别为7.792、26.000、33.412,P均〈0.01);在按皮肤病理诊断分组中,GSTPl基因DNA甲基化阳性率一般病变(21.43%,6/28)、癌前病变(50.00%,10/20)、癌变组(80.00%,4/5)与对照组(6.67%,1/15)比较差异有统计学意义(x。值分别为3.562、7.468、10.756,P均〈O.05)。GsTPl基因DNA甲基化阳性率随砷中毒患者病情及皮肤病理损害程度加重而升高(趋势x。=38.239、x。=13.659,P均〈0.01)。与对照组(0.18426)比较,中(0.08777)、重度(0.05693)砷中毒组外周血GSTPlmRNA表达显著降低(P均〈0.01),其中重度砷中毒组低于中度砷中毒组(P〈0.01);与对照组(0.33845)、一般病变组(0.27674)比较,癌前病变组(0.10481)、癌变组(0.04370)GSTPlmRNA表达显著降低(P均〈0.01),其中癌变组显著低于癌前病变组(P〈0.01)。皮肤组织中GSTPl蛋白阳性表达率组间比较差异有统计学意义(x2=20.948,P〈0.05),其中癌前病变组(65.00%,13/20)、癌变组(40.00%,2/5)与对照组(100.00%,15/15)比较差异有统计学意义(x2=12.183、11.778,P均〈0.01)。皮肤病损程度与GSTPl蛋白表达强度经Spearman等级相关分析,呈负相关关系(r=-0.520,P〈0.05)。按GSTPl基因DNA甲基化分组,GSTPlmRNA和蛋白表达阳性率与非甲基化组(0.18707、95.74%)比较,甲基化组(0.03840、57.14%)显著降低(Z=9.032,P〈0.01;x2=23.134,P〈0.01)。结论砷中毒可通过导致人体GSTPl基因启动子区DNA甲基化,进而抑制其mRNA和蛋白表达,GSTPl基因在砷致病或致癌过程中起重要作用。 Objective To investigate DNA methylation in the promoter region, mRNA transcription and protein expression of glutathione-S-transferases-P1 (GSTPI) gene and their relation with arsenism. Methods In endemic coal-pollution-borne arsenism area, Jiaole village of Xinren county, Guizhou province, according to the diagnostic criteria of endemic arsenism(WS/T 211-2001 ), 123 cases with endemic arsenism were selected and divided into three groups (mild arsenism group: 42 cases, moderate arsenism group: 41 cases and severe arsenism group:40 cases). Forty seven residents were selected as controls in a village about 12 km away from the endemic arsenism area. With the informed consent principle, peripheral blood of all respondents was collected in order to analyze DNA methylation and check mRNA. DNA methylation of GSTP1 gene promoter region in peripheral blood was assayed by PCR, and GSTP1 mRNA expression was assayed using real-time quantitative PCR. In addition, other cutaneous specimens originated from 53 cases with arsenism that accepted surgical treatment voluntarily were taken. Of these specimens, general pathological changes were 28 cases, precancerous 20 cases and cancerous 5 cases. Skin tissues of 15 cases of non-tumor surgery patients without abnormal pathological changes were as control group. GSTP1 protein expression in the skin tissue was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results Among different groups of arsenic poisoning, the positive rate of DNA methylation of GSTP1 gene was 28.57% (12/42) in the mild group, 57.10%(23/41) in the moderate group and 65.00%(26/40) in the severe group. Compared with the control group (6.38%, 3/47 ), the difference was statistically significant (~2 = 7.792, 26.000, 33.412, all P 〈 0.01). Among different groups of arsenic poisoning diagnosed by dermapathology, the positive rate of DNA methylation of GSTP1 gene was 21.43%(6/28) in the general pathological change group, 50.00%(10/20) in the precancerous group and 80.00% (4/5) in the cancerous group. Compared with the control group (6.67%, 1/15), the difference was statistically significant(x2 = 3.562, 7.468, 10.756, all P 〈 0.05). It showed that the positive rate of DNA methylation of GSTP1 gene increased with aggravation of the disease and dermatic lesion of arsenism (tendency x2 = 38.239, x2 = 13.659, all P 〈 0.01 ). Compared with the control group (0.184 26), the expressions of GSTP1 mRNA in peripheral blood in moderate (0.087 77) and severe arsenic poisoning groups(0.056 93)were significantly reduced(all P〈 0.01 ), and that of severe group was significantly lower than that of the moderate group(P 〈 0.01 ) ; compared with the control group (0.338 45) and the general lesion group (0.276 74), GSTP1 mRNA expression was significantly reduced in precancerous lesion group(0.104 81) and cancerous group(0.043 70), in which the cancerous group was significantly lower than that of the precancerous lesions. The difference of skin tissue GSTP1 protein expression rate between groups was statistically significant (~2 = 20.948, P 〈 0.05 ), in which the difference between the precancerous lesion group(65.00%, 13/20), the cancer group (40.00%, 2/5) and the control group (100.00%, 15/15) was statistically significant (X2= 12.183, 11.778, P 〈 0.01). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the degree of skin lesion and the level of GSTP1 protein expression was negatively correlated (r = - 0.520, P 〈 0.05). Groups Were divided according to DNA methylation of GSTP1 gene, and the mRNA and protein expression of GSTP1 in methylation group (0.038 40, 57.14%) was significantly lower compared with that of unmethylated group (0.187 07, 95.74% ; Z = 9.032, X2 = 23.134, all P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions Arsenism may lead to DNA methylation of human GSTP1 gene promoter region, thereby inhibiting expression of mRNA and protein. GSTP1 gene plays an important role in arsenism or carcinogenic process.
出处 《中华地方病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期7-12,共6页 Chinese Journal of Endemiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30960337、30760225) 贵州省科技基金(黔科合重大专项字[2006]6016号)
关键词 砷中毒 谷胱甘肽硫转移酶P1 DNA甲基化 转录 基因表达 Arsenic poisoning Coal Glutathione-S-transferases-P1 DNA methylation Transcription Gene expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张爱华.砷与健康[M]北京:科学出版社,2008105-108.
  • 2张波,李道传,陈雯.环境化学致癌物的表观遗传调控研究进展[J].中华预防医学杂志,2011,45(5):452-455. 被引量:4
  • 3潘雪莉,张爱华.亚砷酸钠对HaCaT细胞MGMT基因甲基化和mRNA及蛋白表达水平的影响[J].中国地方病学杂志,2011,30(3):273-278. 被引量:7
  • 4梁冰,张爱华,董学新.谷胱甘肽硫转移酶GSTO1基因Glu155△Glu位点多态性与燃煤污染型地方性砷中毒的关系[J].中国地方病学杂志,2012,31(1):20-23. 被引量:4
  • 5Yuan Y,Qian ZR,Sano T. Reduction of GSTP1 expression by DNA methylation correlates with clinicopathological features in pituitary adenomas[J].Modern Pathology,2008,(07):856-865.doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.60.
  • 6Bryzgunova OE,Morozkin ES,Yarmoschuk SV. Methylation-specific sequencing of GSTP1 gene promoter in circulating/extracellular DNA from blood and urine of healthy donors and prostate cancer patients[J].Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,2008.222-225.
  • 7Woodson K,O'Reilly KJ,Hanson JC. The usefulness of the detection of GSTP1 methylation in urine as a biomarker in the diagnosis of prostate cancer[J].Journal of Urology,2008,(02):508-511.
  • 8Richiardi L,Fiano V,Vizzini L. Promoter methylation in APC,RUNX3,and GSTP1 and mortality in prostate cancer patients[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2009,(19):3161-3168.doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2485.
  • 9Ronneberg JA,Tost J,Solvang HK. GSTP1 promoter haplotypes affect DNA methylation levels and promoter activity in breast carcinomas[J].Cancer Research,2008,(14):5562-5571.doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5828.
  • 10Zhang Y,Qu X,Jing W. GSTP1 determines cis-platinum cytotoxicity in gastric adenccarcinoma MGC803 cells:regulation by promoter methylation and extracellular regulated kinase signaling[J].Anti-Cancer Drug Design,2009,(03):208-214.

二级参考文献107

  • 1张爱华,李健,潘雪莉,蒋宪瑶,岑笃才,黄晓欣.砷中毒患者皮肤组织中DNA修复基因的表达变化[J].中国地方病学杂志,2005,24(2):121-123. 被引量:22
  • 2潘雪莉,张爱华,黄晓欣,蒋宪瑶.p16基因突变及甲基化在砷致癌中的作用[J].中国地方病学杂志,2005,24(2):127-129. 被引量:16
  • 3陈立军,王玮,于利人,倪虹,呼文亮.亚硫酸氢盐-基因组测序法在检测基因异常甲基化中的应用[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(22):1280-1283. 被引量:2
  • 4梁冰,张爱华,奚绪光,黄晓欣.GSTO基因多态性与燃煤污染型砷中毒易感性的关系[J].环境与职业医学,2007,24(2):129-132. 被引量:9
  • 5Zhang AH,Feng H,Yang G H,et al.Unventilated indoor coalfired stoves in Guizhou province,China:cellular and genetic damage in villagers exposed to arsenic in food and air[J].Environ Health Perspect,2007,115(4):653-658.
  • 6Ghosh P,Banerjee M,Giri AK,et al.Toxicogenomics of arsenic:classical ideas and recent advances[J].Mutat Res,2008,659(3):293-301.
  • 7Vogel U,Dybdahl M,Frentz G,et al DNA repair capacity:inconsistency between effect of over-expression of five NER genes and the correlation to mRNA levels in primary lymphocytes[J].Mutat Res,2000,461 (3):197-210.
  • 8Bustin SA,Benes V,Nolan T,et al.Quantitative real-time RTPCR-a perspective[J].J Mol Endocrinol,2005,34 (3):597-601.
  • 9Rechkunova NI,Lavrik OI.Nucleotide excision repair in higher eukaryotes:mechanism of primary damage recognition in global genome repair[J].Subcell Biochem,2010,50:251-277.
  • 10Yang M,Kim WH,Choi Y,et al.Effects of ERCC1 expression in peripheral blood on the risk of head and neck cancer[J].Eur J Cancer Prey,2006,15(3):269-273.

共引文献23

同被引文献40

  • 1Bhattacharjee P, Banerjee M, Giri AK. Role of genomic instability in arsenic - induced carcinogenicity: a review[J ]. Environ Int, 2013, 53 : 29 - 40.
  • 2Ahmed S, Mahabbat - e Khoda S, Rekha RS, et al. Arsenic - associ- ated oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune disruption in human placenta and cord blood [ J ]. Environ Health Perspect, 2011, 119 : 2.
  • 3Shen H, Xu W, Zhang J, et al. Urinary metabolic biomarkers link ox- idative stress indicators associated with general arsenic exposure to male infertility in a Hem Chinese population[J]. Environ Sei Technol,2013, 47:8843 - 8851.
  • 4Jomova K, Jenisova Z, Feszterova M, et al. Arsenic:toxicity, oxida- tive stress and human disease[J]. J Appl Toxicol, 2011, 31:95 - 107.
  • 5Ren X, Mchale CM, Skibola CF, et al. An emerging role for epigenet- ic dysregulation in arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis [ J ], Environ Health Perspect, 2011, 119:11 - 19.
  • 6Gribble MO, Tang WY, Shang Y, et al. Differential methylation of the arsenic (III) methyltransferase promoter according to arsenic expo- sure[J ]. Arch Toxicol, 2014, 88 : 275 - 282.
  • 7Sarmishtha Chanda, Urea B Dasgupta, Debendranath Guha Mazumder, et al. Human GMDS gene fragment hypermethylation in chronic high level of arsenic exposure with and without arsenic induced cancer[J ]. Springerplus, 2013, 2:557.
  • 8Feinberg A. DNA methylation in cancer; three decades of discovery [J]. Genome Med, 2014, 6(5) ;36.
  • 9Mass M J, Wang L. Arsenic alters cytosine methylation patterns of the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene p53 in human lung cells: a model for a mechanism of carcinogenesis[ J ]. Mutat Res, 1997,386 (3) :263 - 277.
  • 10Chanda S, Dasgupta UB, Guharrmzumder D, et al. DNA hypermethy- lation of promoter of gene p53 and p16 in arsenic - exposed people with and without malignancy[ J ]. Toxicol Sci, 2006,89 : 431 - 437.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部