期刊文献+

七维度对服务补救体系绩效的影响 被引量:1

An Empirical Examination of Effect of Seven Structural Dimensions of Service Recovery System on Recovery Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转型中的中国服务业在观念上越来越意识到服务补救的重要性,然而调查显示,很多服务失误往往由于企业自身补救体系的不完善而被忽视或者得不到及时反映。在充分的理论研究基础上,提出服务补救体系是一个由规章制度正式性、分权、顾客参与、综合性、可及性、员工培训强度和资源投入强度七个维度构成的完整体系,建立了以服务补救体系七维度为源头的服务补救绩效模型。通过对国内46家服务企业的实证调研,共收集351份有效问卷。使用SPSS17.0和LISREL8.70软件,采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析方法,对服务补救绩效量表进行实证分析,找出影响服务补救绩效的关键性因素。最终研究结果可为企业构建自身服务补救体系和评估服务补救绩效提供理论支撑。 China's service organizations pay increasingly more attention to service recovery during transition period.However,according to the statistics,a great many service failures are still ignored or not responded because of the incomplete service recovery systems.Based on full literature research,the study proposes that service recovery systems is a multi-dimensional structure,and expounds a recovery performance model by these dimensions.After surveying 46 service organizations,351 valid questionnaires are received.The study uses SPSS17.0 and LISREL8.70 to analyze the scale and makes use of an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to explore the crucial influencing factors of recovery performance.Accordingly,the results can provide practicing managers with a tool which to construct their organizations' own recovery system or evaluate the recovery performance.
作者 宋伟 纪凯
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第1期80-87,共8页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社科课题(09YJA820077) 安徽省自然科学基金项目(070416247)
关键词 服务补救体系 多维度 访谈 量表开发 service recovery system multi-dimensional depth interview scale development
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献57

  • 1Spreng, Richard A., Robert D. Mackoy. An Empirical Examination of a Model of Perceived Service Quality and Satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 1996, 72(2): 201-214.
  • 2Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, Leonard L. Berry. SERVOUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 1988, 64(1): 12-40.
  • 3Aaker, Jennifer L.. Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(8): 347-356.
  • 4Peterson, Robert A.. A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 1994, 21(9): 381-391.
  • 5Clogg, Clifford C., Eva Petkova, Adamantios Haritou. Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients between Models. American Journal of Sociology, 1995, 100(4): 1261- 1293.
  • 6McColl-kennedy, Janet R., Beverley A. Sparks.. Application of Fairness Theory to Service Failures and Service Recovery. Journal of Service Research, 2003, 5(3): 251-266.
  • 7Olsen, Line Lervik, Michael D. Johnson. Service Equity, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: From Transaction-specific to Culmulative Evaluations. Journal of Service Research, 2003, 5(3): 184-195
  • 8Smith, Amy K., Ruth N. Bolton, Janet Wagner. A Model of Consumer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 1999, 36(8): 356-372.
  • 9Tax Stephen S. and Murali Chandrashekaran. Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experience: Implications for Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1998, 62(4): 60-76.
  • 10Kelly, Scott W., K. Douglas Hoffman, Mark A. Davis. A Typology of Retail Failures and Recoveries. Journal of Retailing, 1993, 69(4): 429-452.

共引文献86

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部