期刊文献+

急诊介入对急性心肌梗死的临床疗效观察

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究并探讨急诊介入对急性心肌梗死的临床治疗效果。方法以我院2011年1月至2011年6月期间急诊共收治的75例急性心肌梗死患者为研究对象,并将所有的患者进行分组,其中的33例患者采用经桡动脉介入治疗的方式来进行治疗,作为桡动脉组,另外的42例患者采用经股动脉介入治疗的方式来进行治疗,作为股动脉组。结果桡动脉组33例患者的穿刺时间、心肌再灌注时间以及介入治疗的成功率与肌动脉组42例患者相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但是桡动脉组患者的平均住院时间则明显短于股动脉组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。桡动脉组患者出血并发症的发生率明显低于股动脉组(P<0.05)。结论急诊介入治疗急性心肌梗死,可以有效的缓解患者的冠状动脉阻塞情况,改善患者的预后,与传统的经股动脉介入治疗相比,经桡动脉介入治疗具有相同的治疗效果,还可以降低并发症的发生率及缩短治疗时间,可以作为急性心肌梗死的首选介入治疗方法,值得在临床中进行大力的推广与应用。
作者 佟军
出处 《中国医药指南》 2012年第36期116-117,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Mathias DW,Biglerl.Transradial coronary angioplasty and stem implantation in acute myocardial infarction:initial experience[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12(11):547.
  • 2Jang-Yong Kim,Junghan Yoon,Hyun-Sook Jung,et al.Feasibility of the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Yonsei Med J,2005,46(2):503.
  • 3Montalescot G,Barragan P,Wittenberg O,et al.Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲ a inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,2001,344(25):1895.
  • 4TJ Ryan, EM Antman, NH Brooks, et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial in- farction: executive summary and recommendations. A report of theAmerican College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation, 1999 : 1016 - 1030.
  • 5R Zahn, R Schiele, S Schneider,et al. Primary angioplasty vs intra- venous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty. Re-suits from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2001,37 : 1827 - 1835.
  • 6L Maillard, M Hamon, K Khalife, et al. A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percuta- neous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarc-tion. J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,35 : 1729 - 1736.
  • 7The GRACE Investigators. Rational and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinationalregistry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J,2001,141:190 - 199.
  • 8Tungsubutra W, Tresukosol D, Krittayaphong R, et al. Primary per- cutaneous transluminal coronatT intervention compared with in/rave- nous thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardialinfarction. J Med Assoc Thai, 2007,90:672 - 678.
  • 9Dryja T, Kornacewiez -Jaeh Z, Goracy J, et al. Treatment of acute ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania prov- ince of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary interventionand thrombolytic therapy. Kardiol Pol,2006,64:591 - 599.
  • 10Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intra-venous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quanti- tative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet, 2003,361:13 -20.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部