期刊文献+

考试焦虑者选择性注意抑制功能研究 被引量:10

On the Inhibition of Selective Attention by People with Test Anxiety
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探究考试焦虑不同程度个体的选择性注意抑制功能。方法:通过考试焦虑问卷,筛选出高、低考试焦虑大学生,以其为被试,采用改进的情绪负启动范式,控制刺激材料的相关度和效价,以语义判断的情绪负启动任务,考察高考试焦虑者的注意抑制能力。结果:高考试焦虑组在考试相关高、低威胁刺激和考试无关高威胁刺激条件下,负启动条件下的反应时间显著短于控制条件下,负启动量显著小于低考试焦虑组,且负启动量值为负;在考试无关低威胁刺激时,负启动条件下的反应时间显著长于控制条件下,负启动量为正,且与低考试焦组无差异。结论:高考试焦虑者对考试相关的特定刺激和一般性高威胁刺激均存在注意抑制困难。 This study aims to explore the inhibition of selective attention by people with test anxiety, by using the test anxiety scale (TAS) to survey college students with high-and low-degree test anxiety, and using the mod- ified negative affective priming paradigm to control the test-correlation and valence of stimulus material. The result show the following, the group with high-degree test anxiety, stimulated by the test-related high-and low-degree threats and the high-degree threats irrelevant to the test, spends a significantly shorter reaction time under the condition of negative priming than under the controlled condition, with its negative priming values significantly being less than the group with low-degree test anxiety; the group with high-degree test anxiety, stimulated by the low-degree threats irrelevant to the test, spends a significantly longer reaction time under the condition of negative priming than under the controlled condition, with its negative priming values showing no difference in comparison with those from the group with low-degree test anxiety. The study concludes that those with high-degree test anxiety show difficulty in attentional inhibition in the presence of test-related stimulus and high-degree threats.
作者 高鑫 周仁来
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期85-91,共7页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(第三批)"认知科学对当代哲学的挑战--心灵与认知科学理论问题研究"(项目号:11&ZD187)基金支持 江苏省研究生培养创新工程 研究生科技创新计划项目"积极情绪对工作记忆影响的神经机制研究"(项目号:CX09B-064Z)资助
关键词 考试焦虑 选择性 注意 抑制 负启动 test anxiety selective attention inhibition negative priming
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Zeidner, M. Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum, 1998.
  • 2Hodapp, V., P. G. Glanzmann, L. Laux. Theory and measurement of test anxiety as a situation - specific trait. In Test Anxiety: Theory, Assessment and Trat- merit. Taylor Francis: Washington, DC, 1995. 47 - 58.
  • 3Lowe, P. A., S. W. Lee. Factor stucture of the test anxiety inventory for children and adolescents (TAICA) scores across gender among students in elementary and secondary school settings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2008,26(3) : 231 - 246.
  • 4Wine, J. Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psy- chological Bulletin, 1971,76(2) : 92 - 104.
  • 5Keogh, E., C. C. French. Test anxiety, evaluative stress, and susceptibility to distraction from threat. Eu- ropean Journal of Personality, 2001,15 : 123 - 141.
  • 6Ahing, T., R. Markham. Test anxiety and distractibili- ty. Journal of Research in Personality, 1993,27:134 - 147.
  • 7Keogh, E., F. W. Bond, C. C. French, et al. Test anxiety, susceptibility to distraction and examination performance. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 2004, 17 (3) :241 - 252.
  • 8Schutz, D., Schwanenflugel. Organization of concepts relevant to emotions and their regulation during test tak- ing. Journal of Experimental Education, 2002,70: 316 - 342.
  • 9Darla, J. L.. Test anxiety: a test of attentional bias.博士论文.The University of Maine, The Graduate School, 2006.
  • 10Putwain, D. W., H. C. l_angdale, K. A. Woods, et al. Developing and piloting a dot- probe measure of attentional bias for test anxiety. I_earning and Individual Differences, 2011,21 : 478 - 482.

二级参考文献33

  • 1宋维真,张瑶.我国大学生考场焦虑与个性特质关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1987,1(4):165-168. 被引量:49
  • 2李文利,钱铭怡.状态特质焦虑量表中国大学生常模修订[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1):108-114. 被引量:208
  • 3刘莹,周仁来.(2008).考试焦虎者注意偏向的认知机制.东南大学校庆报告.
  • 4Eysenck, M.W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.
  • 5Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., Dutton, K. (2001). Do Threatening Stimuli Draw or Hold Visual Attention in Subclinical Anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681 - 700.
  • 6Kensinger, E.A., Schacter, D.L. (2006). Processing emotional pictures and words: Effects of valence and arousal. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 110 - 126.
  • 7Keogh, E. , French, C.C. (2001). Test anxiety, evaluative stress, and susceptibility to distraction from threat. European Journal of Personality, 15, 123-141.
  • 8Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Houwer, J.D. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage, t3ekaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1183- 1192.
  • 9Newman, E. (1996). No More Test Anxiety. Los Angeles: Learning Skills PublieationsMaeleod, C., Rutherford, E. M. (1992).Anxiety and the .selective processing of emotional information: mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 479 -491.
  • 10Mathews, A. , Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of .selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539 - 560.

共引文献445

同被引文献198

引证文献10

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部