期刊文献+

冲突不对称的前因:一个基于过程观的分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于团队内冲突的研究大多假定所有成员感知到相同程度的冲突,而实际上团队内存在冲突不对称的现象,即团队成员对冲突可能存在不同的感知,且其程度会对团队及个体绩效产生显著影响。在综述已有关于冲突不对称研究的基础上,从冲突的过程观视角探讨了冲突不对称产生的前因以及避免和减小冲突不对称的方法,并在个体层面分析了冲突不对称的内在构成。
作者 张钢 崔红云
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期148-152,共5页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71072117)
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1DEUTSCH M. A theory of cooperation and competition [J].Human Relations, 1949(2) : 129-152.
  • 2EMERSON R. Power-dependence relations[J]. American So-ciological Review, 1962(27) :31-41.
  • 3PONDY L. Organizational conflict: Concepts and models[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967 ,12(2) : 296-320.
  • 4JEHN K. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensionsin organizational groups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42C3):530-557.
  • 5DEDREU C, WEINGART L. Task versus relationshipconflict : a meta-analysis[J]. Academy of Management Pro-ceedings ? 2002CCM) : Bl-B6.
  • 6MEDINA F,MUNDUATE L, DORADO M. Types of in-tragroup conflict and affective reactions [J]. Journal ofManagerial Psychology, 2005,20 (3/4) : 219-230.
  • 7JEHN K. A multimethod examination of the benefits anddetriments of intragroup conflict [J]. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 1995(40):256-282.
  • 8JEHN K,MANNIX E. The dynamic nature of conflict: alongitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group perform-ance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001? 44 (2):238-251.
  • 9JEHN K,BENDERSKY C. Intragroup conflict in organizations: acontingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship[J].Research in Organizational Behavior, 2003(25) : 187-242.
  • 10DEDREU C,WEINGART L. Task versus relationship con-flict, team performance, and team member satisfaction:a me-ta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003 ,88(4):741-749.

二级参考文献31

  • 1De Dreu, C.K.W. and L.R. Weingart, Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(4):741-749.
  • 2Jehn, K.A. and C. Bendersky. Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-outcome Relationship[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2003,25:187-243.
  • 3Amason, A.C., Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(1):123-148.
  • 4Amason, A.C. and H.J. Sapienza. The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict[J]. Journal of Management, 1997,23(4):495.
  • 5Jehn, K.A. A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2):256-282.
  • 6Jehn, K.A. A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(3):530-557.
  • 7Amason, A. and D. Schweiger. Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance [J]. International Journal of Conflict Management 1994, 5:239-253.
  • 8Jehn, K.A., G.B. Northcraft, and M.A. Neale. Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(4):741-763.
  • 9Simons, T., L.H. Pelled, and K.A. Smith. Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(6):662-673.
  • 10Jehn, K.A. and E.A. Mannix. The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(2):238-251.

共引文献11

同被引文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部