中美英行政管理型知识产权网络信息服务对比研究

The Network Information Service Comparison of the Intellectual Property Administrative Authority of China,the United States and Britain

就传统知识产权专业领域(专利、商标、版权)而言,当今世界各国行政管理型知识产权网络信息服务呈现出以中国为代表的专利、版权和商标信息服务分离型、以美国为代表的专利商标和版权信息服务并立型和以英国为代表的专利、版权和商标信息服务综合型三种模式。中国模式具有分散性特点,在专利信息资源的整合服务方面有一定的优势;美国模式具有专利、商标和版权信息服务同步发展、专业资源整合服务强的明显优势,尤其在版权信息资源整合方面积累了丰富的经验;英国模式则对知识产权信息进行综合服务,因而具有资源全面整合优势,同时体现了以人为本的特色。我们应该吸取经验、系统推进,尽快构建我国综合性知识产权公共信息服务平台,为实施知识产权战略、建设创新型国家服务。

The networks of administrative organs of intellectual property are the best public service platform for the demanders of intel- lectual property information service in our country. But at present, There exist a lot of problems of this type of intellectual property information service networks, for example, the service level of these networks is not balanced, these are much wasteful duplicate construction, resource integration and value - added service needs to be strengthened and so on. In terms of the traditional intellectual property fields, there are three modes of administrative organs＇ network information service, including the first type of separation of three kinds of information in China, the second type of coexistence of patents, trademarks and copyright information in the United States and the third type of synthetic information service of three kinds in Britain. The three modes have their own characteristics and advantages. We should learn from the experience of the three modes and promote the construction of our comprehensive intellectual property public information service platform as soon as possible, in order to implement intellectual property strategy and build an innovation - oriented country.