期刊文献+

大豆疫霉检疫熏蒸处理技术初探 被引量:2

Study on the quarantine fumigation technology of Phytophthora sojae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Soybean Phytophthora root rot(PPR) that cause by Phytophthora sojae is one of the most serious diseases in the main soybean production area all over the world.In this manuscript,we analyzed the fungitoxicity of methyl bromide,propylene oxide,methyl iodide and carbonyl sulfide,their influences on the quality of soybean were also determined.Our results confirmed the efficacy of the four fumigants against Phytophthora sojae,their EC99 values were methyl bromide 21.24mg/L,propylene oxide 33.21 mg/L,methyl iodide 4.64 mg/L and carbonyl sulfide 46.73mg/L for 24h fumigation at 20℃.Moreover,quality analysis results showed that there were not significant differences between untreated and treated soybeans after 30d storage,indicating that fumigation with tested fumigants would be the candidates for control of Phytophthora sojae,especially methyl iodide. Soybean Phytophthora root rot(PPR) that cause by Phytophthora sojae is one of the most serious diseases in the main soybean production area all over the world.In this manuscript,we analyzed the fungitoxicity of methyl bromide,propylene oxide,methyl iodide and carbonyl sulfide,their influences on the quality of soybean were also determined.Our results confirmed the efficacy of the four fumigants against Phytophthora sojae,their EC_99 values were methyl bromide 21.24mg/L,propylene oxide 33.21 mg/L,methyl iodide 4.64 mg/L and carbonyl sulfide 46.73mg/L for 24h fumigation at 20℃.Moreover,quality analysis results showed that there were not significant differences between untreated and treated soybeans after 30d storage,indicating that fumigation with tested fumigants would be the candidates for control of Phytophthora sojae,especially methyl iodide.
出处 《植物检疫》 北大核心 2013年第1期21-24,共4页 Plant Quarantine
基金 2012动植物检疫处理专项
关键词 大豆疫霉 熏蒸 品质 Phytophthora sojae quarantine fumigation quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献39

  • 1李长松.大豆根腐病的研究概况[J].中国油料,1993,15(1):77-81. 被引量:28
  • 2王海光,祝慧云,马占鸿,刘亮,张贵新.小麦矮腥黑穗病研究进展与展望[J].中国农业科技导报,2005,7(4):21-27. 被引量:14
  • 3顾斌,顾忠盈,吴新华,周明华.开展进口大豆产地检疫的意义及建议[J].植物检疫,2006,20(4):234-237. 被引量:4
  • 4AthowKL. Anewmajor gene for resistance toP.me.Var. Sojae in soybean[J]. Phytopathology, 1980, 70: 977-980.
  • 5Bernard R L. An allete at the rpsl locus from the variet "Kingwa"[J]. Soybean Genet. Newsl, 1981, 8: 30-33.
  • 6Layton A C. New physiologic race of P.me.f.sp.glycinea[J]. Plant Disease, 1986, 70: 333-338.
  • 7Schmitthenner AF. Tolerance verus resistance for control ofphytophthora root rot of soybean in "Pro. 9th soybean seedres.conf" [C]. 1979-35-44.
  • 8Jimenez B. Laboratorymethod for assessing field tolerance ofsoybean seedling toP.me.var.sojae[J]. Plant Disease, 1980, 64: 775-778.
  • 9Tooley P W. Indentification and quantilative characterri- za-tion of rate-reducing resistance toP.me.f.sp.glycinea in soybean sedling[J]. Phytopathology, 1982, 72: 727-733.
  • 10Thomison P R. Evidence of pathogen specificity in toleranceof soybean cultivars to phytophthora rot[J]. Crop Science, 1988, 28: 714-715.

共引文献42

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部