期刊文献+

基于ARDL模型长三角碳排放、能源消费和经济增长关系研究 被引量:25

MODELING RELATIONSHIP AMONG CARBON EMISSION, ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH BY ARDL IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA
原文传递
导出
摘要 碳排放量、能源消费量和经济增长间存在着密切的关系。长三角地区(研究该区域为上海、浙江、江苏,简称长三角,下同)碳减排措施的实施是否会影响长三角地区的经济增长,能源消费量、能源结构和碳排放量间存在何种联系,这些均是在长三角碳减排政策制定中亟待考虑的问题。利用1990~2010年,长三角的能源经济样本数据,使用ARDL模型和格兰杰因果检验模型(Granger)定量的研究了上述几个因素之间的关系。研究发现:当碳排放量、能源消费和经济增长分别为回归变量时,均存在其它解释变量和每个回归变量间的长期稳定的协整关系。在长期关系中,存在经济增长对碳排放量的负向弹性影响。能源消费对经济增长的影响为正,能源消费每增长1%,经济增长0.67%。碳排放量对经济增长的长期影响为负,碳排放量每增长1%,经济则减少0.49%。Granger因果关系的研究表明:滞后长度分别为3,4时,存在从经济增长到能源消费和碳排放量倒的单向因果关系。不存在从能源消费和碳排放量到经济增长的单向因果关系,且亦不存在碳排放量和能源消费的双向因果关系。在长三角,制定和实施适当的节能减排政策将不会阻碍该地区经济增长。节能减排政策的制定,应首先考虑能源结构优化,降低长三角高碳能源的消费比重。 There is a close relationship between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth. Whether implementation of carbon emission reduction measures will affect the economic growth in the Yangtze River Delta region and what kind of relationship among energy consumption, energy structure and carbon emissions are the urgent problem which are thought about in making the carbon emission reduction policies in the develop- ment of the Yangtze River Delta region. This paper examinesd the casual relationship between carbon emissions, en- ergy consumption and economic growth using the ARDL model and Granger causality test model in the Yangtze River Delta region (Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu) during 1990 -- 2010. The results indicated that when the carbon e- missions, energy consumption and economic growth were the regression variables, respectively, there were the long- term stability cointegration relationship between other explanatory variables and each regression variable. In the long-term relationship,there was the negative impact on carbon emissions from economic growth. The impact of en- ergy consumption on economic growth was positive. The impact of energy consumption on economic growth was around 0. 67 and statistically significant at 1% level,meaning that 1% increase in energy consumption would result in 0. 67% increase in economic growth. The long-run impact of carbon emission on economic growth was negative. The impact of carbon emission on economic growth was around 0.49 and statistically significant at 1 % level, mean- ing that 1% increase in carbon emission would result in 0.49 % decrease in economic growth. Both in long-run and short-run relationship,the impact of energy consumption on carbon emissions was positive and significant at 1 % level. This indicated that the proportion of high-carbon energy consumption reduction and the reduction of energy consumption would contribute to achieve the carbon reduction goals in the Yangtze River Delta region. When ener- gy consumption was a regression variable, there was no short-run relationship among economic growth, carbon e- missions and energy consumption. However, the carbon emissions had a positive impact on energy consumption both in the short and long term relationship. Granger causality studies showed that:when the lag length was 3 or 4, respectively, there was unidirectional causality from economic growth to energy consumption and carbon emissions. There was not unidirectional causality from energy consumption and carbon emissions to economic growth. And the direction causal relationship between carbon emissions and energy consumption did not exist. In the short-term rela- tionship, the impact of economic growth on carbon emissions was not significant, when carbon emissions was a re- gressive variable. The stability test showed that when carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth were as the regression variables, the calculations of the interaction impact among the carbon emissions, energy con- sumption and economic growth were stable and reliable. Therefore, to develop and implement appropriate energy saving and emission reduction policies will not impede the economic growth in the Yangtze River Delta region. When making energy conservation policy, government should first consider optimizing the energy structure and re- ducing the proportion of the high-carbon energy consumption in the Yangtze River Delta region. Government should actively develop a low-carbon technologies (coal clean and efficient use of carbon dioxide capture and sequestra- tion) ,and vigorously develop and use low-carbon renewable energy and new energy sources (nuclear, solar, wind, biomass,geothermal, ocean, hydrogen)alternative to traditional high-carbon fossil fuels, and improve the Yangtze River Delta region over-reliance on fossil energy consumption structure. Then, we focus on reducing energy intensi- ty and industrial structure adjustment,optimization and upgrading.
作者 翟石艳 王铮
出处 《长江流域资源与环境》 CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期94-103,共10页 Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
基金 国家重大科学研究计划项目(973计划:2012CB955803) 中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX2-YW-Q1-09) 国家自然科学基金项目(41071089)
关键词 碳排放 能源结构 经济增长 长三角 ARDL模型 carbon emissions energy structure economic growth the Yangtze River Delta ARDL
  • 相关文献

参考文献58

  • 1KAYGUSUZ K. Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions for sustainable development in Tur- key[-l. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13 : 253-70.
  • 2MEHRARA M. Energy consumption and economic growth: The case of oil exporting countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35:2939 2945.
  • 3NARAYAN PK, NARAYAN S, PRASAD A. A structural VAR analysis of electricity consumption and real GDP: Evi dence from the G7 countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36: 2765-9.
  • 4BELLOUMI M. Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia : Co- integration and causality analysis[J]. Energy Policy, 2009,37: 2745-2753.
  • 5PAO H T. Forecast of electricity consumption and economic growth in Taiwan by state space modeling[J]. Energy, 2009, 34:1779-1791.
  • 6MOOMAW W R, UNRUH G C. Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO2 emissionstJ]. Envi ronment and Development Economics, 1997, Z : 451-463.
  • 7朱永彬,王铮,庞丽,王丽娟,邹秀萍.基于经济模拟的中国能源消费与碳排放高峰预测[J].地理学报,2009,64(8):935-944. 被引量:195
  • 8KRAFT J, KRAFT A. On the relationship between energy and GNP[J]. Journal of Energy and Development, 1978, 3:401-403.
  • 9ZACHARIADIS T. Exploring the relationship between ener gy use and economic growth with bi-variate models: New evi- dence from G-7 eountries[J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 29 (6) : 1233-1253.
  • 10LISE W, VAN MONTFORT K. Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is there a co-integration relationship? [J]. Energy Economics,ZOO7,29(6) :1166-1178.

二级参考文献185

共引文献1230

同被引文献405

引证文献25

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部