期刊文献+

社会角色、个体异质性和公共品自愿供给 被引量:57

Social Role, Heterogenous Preferences and Public Goods Provision
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过两阶段公共品博弈测度出个体社会偏好类型,研究个体社会偏好异质类型的分布规律和社会角色影响公共品自愿供给水平的直接效应和间接效应。实验研究发现:个体社会偏好存在异质性;搭便车行为和条件性合作者的自我服务偏向是公共品自愿供给的两大特征事实,两者对于公共品自愿供给水平有着至关重要的决定性作用。分析结果表明个体社会偏好的异质类型会显著影响公共品自愿供给水平,而性别和学生干部等社会角色存在显著差异的个体异质类型分布,由此间接地影响公共品自愿供给水平。与此同时,不同的社会角色也会直接影响公共品自愿供给水平。实验分析结果证实并且揭示社会角色影响公共品自愿供给水平的直接影响效应和间接渠道效应。 Basing on the two-stage public goods experiment, this paper sheds light on the distribution of individuals' heterogenous preferences and the direct and indirect effects of social role on the public goods provision. The experimental results indicate that the individuals' decision-making behaviors in public goods are heterogeneity, and the free-riding of free-rider and self-serving bias in conditional cooperators are two typical facts in the public goods experiment, which play a crucial role "in the understanding of the aggregation behavior in public goods. And the results also show that different types of individuals' preferences have distinct effects on voluntary contribution of public goods game, while the social roles such as gender and the identity of cadres have significant effects on public goods provision, whose effects are direct and indirect that via the heterogenous preferences. These results are in favor of the theory of the direct and indirect effects of social role on public goods provision.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期123-136,共14页 Economic Research Journal
基金 国家社科基金项目“社会偏好理论与社会合作机制研究”(项目批准号12BJL039)的阶段性研究成果 汕头大学科研启动经费资助项目“公共服务自愿供给的脆弱性和合作机制研究:实验研究视角”(项目编号STF12011)资助
关键词 公共品实验 异质性 身份 Public Goods Experiment Heterogeneity Identity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献98

  • 1Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
  • 2Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
  • 3Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
  • 4Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.
  • 5Kurzban, R., and Houser, D., 2005, “Experiments Investigating Cooperative Types in Humans: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulations”, PNAS, 102: 1803-1807.
  • 6Laury, S.K., Walker, J.M., and Williams A.W., 1999, "The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good with Diminishing Marginal Returns", Public Choice, 99: 139-160.
  • 7Ledyard, J.O., 1995, “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research” in Kagel, J.H., and Roth, A.E., (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 8Levy-Garboua, L., Meidinger, C., and Rapoport, B., 2006, “The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology”, in S. Kolm and Jean Mercier Ythier (ed.), 2006, Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, volume 1, Elsevier.
  • 9Marwell, G. and Ames, R., 1979, “Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods 1: Resources, Interest, Group Size, and the Free-rider Problem”, American Journal of Sociology, 84 : 1335-1360.
  • 10Mueller, D.C., 2003, Public Choice Ⅲ, Cambridge University Press; 3 edition.

同被引文献926

引证文献57

二级引证文献479

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部