期刊文献+

家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能的中介作用 被引量:110

Social Economic Status and Study Engagement:The Mediating Effects of Academic Self-efficacy among Junior High School
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用家庭社会经济地位、学业自我效能与学习投入量表,调查了953名初中生,运用结构方程模型探讨了家庭社会经济地位、学业自我效能与学习投入之间的关系。在控制学生性别、年级,以及先前学习成绩的影响后,结果发现:(1)家庭社会经济地位越高,学生对学习的投入就越多;(2)学业自我效能在家庭社会经济地位与学习投入之间起完全中介作用;(3)在家庭社会经济地位的组成成分与学习投入的关系中,家庭收入可以显著预测学习投入,而父母亲职业、父母亲教育水平对学习投入均无直接预测作用,它们是通过家庭收入的中介作用,再经过学业自我效能而影响学习投入。 Socioeconomic status (SES) is one of the most widely studied constructs in the social sciences. Several ways of measuring SES have been proposed, but most include some quantification of family income, parental education, and occupational status. Research shows that SES is associated with a wide array of health, cognitive, and socioemotional outcomes in children, with effects beginning prior to birth and continuing into adulthood. High SES families afford their children an array of services, goods, parental actions, and social connections that potentially redound to the benefit of children and a concern that many low SES children lack access to those same resources and experiences, thus putting them at risk for developmental problems. It is expected that socioeconomic status is positively related to study engagement. Bandura' s social-cognitive theory defines self-efficacy as the ' belief in one' s capabilities to organize and execute the course of action required to produce given attainments'. It is expected that academic self-efficacy is positively related to study engagement because self-efficacy leads to a greater willingness to spend additional energy and effort on completing a task or an assignment and hence to more task involvement and absorption. Based on our conceptual model, the research formulated the following two hypotheses: HI: The better the social economic status, the more study engagement. H2: academic self-efficacy would serve as a mediator of the relationship between social economic status and study engagement. In order to examine and investigate the mediating effects of academic self-efficacy on the relationship between social economic status and study engagement, 953 students as subjects from 8 junior high schools in the cities of Nantong and Yaneheng were chosen randomly. SEM results revealed that (1) social economic status have significantly positive direct influence on study engagement; (2) academic self-efficacy is one of the mediating factors between social economic status and study engagement ; (3) The relationship between social economic status and study engagement is in nature through the influence of family income on study engagement, and parental education, occupational status are also through the influence of family income on study engagement. Academic self-efficacy is one of the mediating factors between family income and study engagement.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期71-78,共8页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部青年专项"班级集体效能感对留守儿童学校适应发展轨迹的影响研究."
关键词 学习投入 学业自我效能 家庭社会经济地位 中介效应 初中生 study engagement academic self-efficacy social economic status mediating effects junior high school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Ackerman, B. P. , Brown, E. D. , & Izard, C. E. ( 2004 ). The relations between persistent poverty and contextual risk and children's behavior in elementary school. Developmental Psychology,40,3,367 -377.
  • 2Artelt, C. , Baumert, J. , Julius-McElvaney, N. , & Peschar, J. ( 2003 ). Learners for life. Paris : OECD.
  • 3Avey,J. B. ,Luthans,F. ,Smith,R. M. ,& Palmer,N. F. (2010). Impaet of positive psychological capital on employee wellbeing over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15,1,17 - 28.
  • 4Bandura, A. ( 1997 ). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York : W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • 5Bradley, R. H. , & Corwyn, R. F. ( 2002 ). Socioeconomic Status and Child Development. Annual Review of Psychology,53,371 - 399.
  • 6Davis-Kean,P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement :The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19,2,294 - 304.
  • 7Howell, A. J. ( 2009 ). Flourishing: Achievement-related correlates of students' well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology,4,1,1 - 13.
  • 8Klem,A. M., & Connell, J. P. ( 2004 ). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74,7,262 - 273.
  • 9Matthews, K. A., & Gallo, L. C. (2011). Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health. Annual Review of Psychology,62,4,1 - 30.
  • 10McLoyd, V. C. ( 1998 ). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist,53,2,185 - 204.

二级参考文献247

共引文献7904

同被引文献1096

引证文献110

二级引证文献1005

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部