期刊文献+

单极电钩在腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术中的应用价值 被引量:1

Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of monopolar hook during laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价单极电钩在腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术中的有效性、安全性。方法:设计开放、随机、配对、前瞻性实验,比较76例腹腔镜下妇科恶性肿瘤根治术患者单侧淋巴结清扫过程中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、手术时间、术后髂窝引流量、10周后淋巴囊肿形成率及直径等数据。结果:单极电钩清扫盆腔淋巴结较之目前较流行的超声刀清扫过程,止血效果相当,但单侧淋巴结清扫数量(13.1±4.5个)、单侧手术时间(26.3±6.1min)、单侧淋巴囊肿形成率(11/76)明显优于后者。结论:合理应用单极电钩可完成腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫,治疗效果强于超声刀,可降低腹腔镜手术费用。 Objective:In this prospective randomized pilot study,we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of monopolar hook during laparoseopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer, and compared to ultrasound knife. Methods: All 76 patients with gynecological cancer , who were suitable to perform laparoscopic lymphadenectomy, were randomly assigned for lymphadeneetomy in one side of the pelvis using monopolar hook, whereas, the other side using ultrasound knife. Results: Compared with the ultrasound knife, monopolar hook had the same ability in hemostasis and cutting during the pelvic lymphadeneetomy, but, make a superior performance in single - side lymph nodes dissection ( 13.1 ± 4.5 Vs 9.4 ± 3.7, P 〈 0.001 ), operation time (26.3 ± 6.1 min Vs 39.4 ± 7.5 min , P = 0. 003 ) and lymphocele formation rate (11/76 Vs 16/76, P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion: Laparoscopie pelvic lymphadeneetomy with monopolar hook is better than ultrasound knife and with decreased cost.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2013年第2期395-397,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 单极电钩 腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术 妇科恶性肿瘤 monopolar hook laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy gynecological cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Walker JL,Piedmonte MR,Spirtos NM. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer:Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2009,(32):5331-5336.doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248.
  • 2Pellegrino A,Vizza E,Fruscio R. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ibl stage cervical cancer:Analysis of surgical and oncological outcome[J].European Journal of Surgical Oncology,2009,(01):98-103.doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.005.
  • 3Mario Malzoni,Raffaele Tinelli,Francesco Cosentino. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer:Our instruments and technique[J].Surgical Oncology,2009,(04):289-297.
  • 4Querleu D,Leblanc E,Cartron G. Audit of preoperative and early complications of laparoscopic lymph node dissection in 1000gynecologic cancer patients[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2006.1287-1292.
  • 5Lee CL,Huang KG,Wang C J. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system:comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery[J].Gynecologic Oncology,2007.620-624.
  • 6Cibula D,Abu-Rustum NR. Pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer-surgical anatomy and proposal for a new classification system[J].Gynecologic Oncology,2010,(1):33-37.doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.003.
  • 7Gossot D,Buess G,Cuschieri A. Ultrasonic dissection for endoscopic surgery[J].Surgical Endoscopy,1999.412-417.
  • 8Amaral JF,Chrosteek CA. Experimental comparison of the ultrasonically activated scalpel to electrosurgery and laser surgery for laparoscopic use[J].Min Invasive Ther Allied Technol,1997.324-331.
  • 9Gelmini R,Franzoni C,Zona S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Harmonic scalpel[J].Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons,2010,(01):14-19.

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部