摘要
《汉书》为东汉班固撰写,他将《史记》的体例运用到断代史的著作当中,并改《史记》中的"书"为"志",且首创了"艺文志",系统整理了西汉以来在目录学方面的资料。其中在《汉书·艺文志》总叙中提到《汉志》是对刘歆的《七略》"删其要,以备篇籍"。《隋书》为唐代的官修史书之一,由唐代魏徵、颜师古等人修撰。其中《隋书·经籍志》在自古以来的史学家口中一直是评价较高的,姚名达更认为其可以"媲美《汉志》,垂裕《四库》"。它首次将典籍分类明称为经、史、子、集四部,对荀勖、李充所标的甲、乙、丙、丁进行了更为明确的改进与发展。基于此,便将《汉志》中的"诸子略"与《隋志》中的"子部"典籍各类状况加以比较分析,从而找到诸子典籍以及诸子思想发展停滞的原因。
Han Shu was written by Ban Gu in the Eastern Han Dynasty. He used the style of Shih Chi in writing dynastic history, and changed "Shu" to "Zhi", created "YiWenZhi", and systematically arranged the information of bibliography since the Western Han Dynasty. Sui Shu was one of the Tang Dynasty revised historical books, written by Wei Zheng, Yah Shigu and so on. Sul Shu · JingJiZhi has been spoken highly of by lots of historians since the ancient times. Yao Mingda even considers it can be comparable to HanZhi and Siku. Bibliography is classified to "Jing", "Shi", "Zi" and "Ji" for the first time. This article will expound that by com- parison of the HanZhi . Zhuzi with the SuiZhi · Zibu, in order to find out the reasons for Zhuzi's classical books' stagnation.
出处
《黑龙江教育学院学报》
2013年第1期127-129,共3页
Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education