期刊文献+

烧伤患者巨细胞病毒复发感染及其对患者预后的评估价值 被引量:4

Analyses on the current status and significance of human cytomegalovirus reactivation in burn patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察烧伤病人巨细胞病毒(human cytomegalovirus,HCMV)复发感染情况及对预后的影响。方法对96例烧伤总体表面积(total body surface area,TBSA)>15%的患者进行动态观察。试验分组:(1)按烧伤面积将患者分为三组:Ⅰ组39例(TBSA 15%-49%),Ⅱ组32例(TBSA 50%-69%),Ⅲ组25例(TBSA 70%-99%);(2)根据脓毒血症诊断标准,将患者进一步分为脓毒症组(33例)和非脓毒症组(63例);(3)根据脓毒症组患者的预后情况,将其分为死亡组(11例)和生存组(22例)。入院24h内采集患者外周静脉血筛查抗HCMV IgG及HCMV-DNA,而后每隔1周左右采集病人血清标本,采用实时荧光定量PCR方法检测血清中HCMV-DNA水平。结果 (1)Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组的HCMV复发感染率分别为53.8%、50.0%和80.0%,Ⅲ组与其他两组之间差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.069,P<0.05)。(2)三组烧伤患者HCMV首次复发时间及每次复发持续时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。HC-MV平均首次复发时间为入院后第14天,每次复发持续时间约为12天。(3)脓毒症组HCMV的复发感染率明显高于非脓毒症组(χ2=4.431,P<0.05),HCMV复发感染率与死亡率不相关(χ2=0.688,P>0.05)。结论烧伤患者HCMV复发感染率高,HCMV复发感染可能对烧伤后脓毒症的发生具有一定影响。 Objective To investigate the current status and significance of human cytomegalovirus reactivation in burn patients. Methods (1) A total of 96 patients with total burn surface area (TBSA) larger than 15 % were included in the study and divided into three groups according to the burn area:Group I (TBSA of 15%-49% ,n=39),Group Ⅱ (TBSA of 50%-69% ,n=32) and Group Ⅲ (TBSA of 70%-99% ,n=25). (2) According to whether there Was development of sepsis or not,patients were divided into sepsis group (n= 33) and non-sepsis group (n= 63). (3) The patients with sepsis were further divided into non-survival group (n=11) and survival group (n= 22). The periphery blood samples from 96 patients were collected on admission and then once a week until the patients were discharged from the hospital. We assessed HCMV viremia by real time polymerase chain reaction and clinical outcome in burn patients. Re- suits (1) The rate of HCMV reactivation in Group Ⅰ ,Group Ⅱ and Group Ⅲ is 53. 8%,50.0% and 80.0%,and Group Ⅲ is higher than the other two groups (x^2 = 6. 069,P〈0.05). (2) There was no significant difference in time of HCMV reactivation and duration of HCMV viremia among the patients with different burn size. The average day to first detectable HCMV viremia is about 14 days after admission. Duration of HCMV viremia is around 12 days. (3) HCMV reactivation was associated Sepsis (x^2 =4. 431 ,P〈0.05). There were no differences oh mortality rate between patients with and without HCMV reactivation (x^2=0. 688,P〉0.05). Conclusion HCMV reactivation rate is consid- erable in burn patients and might influence the development of severe sepsis in patients with burn.
出处 《中国实验诊断学》 2013年第1期103-106,共4页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis
基金 无锡市医院管理中心医学技术重大扶持项目(YGZF1101)
关键词 烧伤 人巨细胞病毒 实时荧光定量PCR Burns Human cytomegalovirus Real-time polymerase chain reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Rennekampff HO, Hamprecht K. Cytomegalovirus infection inburns:a review [J] . J Med Microbiol,2006,55 (Pt 5):483.
  • 2Ljungman P, Griffiths P, Paya C. Definitions of cytomegalovirusinfection and disease in transplant recipients [J] . Clin Infect Dis,2002,34(8):1094.
  • 3姚咏明,盛志勇,林洪远,柴家科.脓毒症定义及诊断的新认识[J].中国危重病急救医学,2004,16(6):321-324. 被引量:309
  • 4NashG? Asch MJ, Foley F'D, et al. Disseminated cytomegalic inelusion disease in a burned adult [J] . J AMA, 1 970,214(3) : 587.
  • 5Seeman J,Konigova R. Cytomegalovirus infections in severelyburned patients[J] . Acta Chir Plast, 1976,18(3) : 142.
  • 6BaleJr JF,Kealey GP, Massanari RM,et al. The epidemiology ofcytomegalovirus infection among patients with burns[J] . InfeclControl Hosp Epidemiol, 1990,1.1(1):17.
  • 7KealeyGP,Bale JF, Strauss RG,et al. Cytomegalovirus infectionin burn patients[J] . J Burn Care Rehabil, 1987 ,8(6) : 543.
  • 8Erickson EJ, Saffle JR, Morris SE, et al. Cytomegalovirus infec-tion promotes bacterial translocation in thermally injured mice[J] . J Hurn Care Rehabil,1990,11(5) :428.
  • 9EricksonEJ,Saffle JR, Morris SE,et al. Bacterial translocation isprolonged in burned mice infected with cytomegalovirus [ J] . JBurn Care Rehabil, 1991 ,12(5) :454.
  • 10Atkinson C,Emery VC. Cytomegalovirus quantification: Whereto next in optimising patient management [ J ] . j Clin Virol,2011,51(4):223.

共引文献308

同被引文献43

  • 1社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3065
  • 2Dahiya P. Burns as a model of SIRS[J]. Front Biosci, 2009,14: 4962-4967.
  • 3Gauglitz GG, Finnerty CC, Herndon DN, et al. Are serum eytokines early predictors for the outcome of burn patients with inha- lation injuries who do not survive? [J]. Crit Care, 2008,12 (3) R81.
  • 4Foldi V, Lantos J, Bogar L, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation methods On the pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines and expres- s!on of adhesion molecules after burn injury[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2010,31(3): 480-491.
  • 5Mace JE,Park MS,Mora AG, et al. Differential expression of the immunoinflammatory response in trauma patients: burn vs. non- burp[J]. Burns,2012,38(4) :599-606.
  • 6Jescbke MG,Gauglitz GG, Kulp GA, et al. Long-term persistance of the pathophysiologic response to severe burn injury[J]. PLoS One,2011,6(7) :e21245.
  • 7Pileri D, Accardo Palombo A, D'Amelio L, et al. Concentrations of cytokines IL-6 and IL-10 in plasma of burn patients:their relation-ship to sepsis and outcome[J]. Ann Burns Fire Disasters,2008,21 (4) : 182-185.
  • 8Kim HS,Kim JH,Yim H,et al. Changes in the levels of interleukins 6,8, and 10, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and granuloeyte-colony stimulating factor in Korean burn patients: relation to burn size and Postburn time[J]. Ann Lab Med, 2012,32 (5) : 339-344.
  • 9Rafla K, Tredget EE. Infection control in the burn unit[J]. Burns,2011,37(1) :5-15.
  • 10Farina JA Jr, Rosique MJ,Rosique RG. Curbing inflammation in burn patients[J]. Int J Inflam, 2013: 715645.

引证文献4

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部