期刊文献+

国内外漂流旅游研究综述 被引量:9

Review on the Research of Rafting/Kayaking/Canoeing Tourism at Home and Abroad
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国内外漂流旅游发展日臻成熟,漂流旅游得到了学术界的广泛关注。文章通过对国内外漂流旅游研究的相关文献进行详细的梳理和分析,从研究方法、研究理论、研究内容3方面评述了国内外漂流旅游的研究进展。总结了国外漂流旅游研究从多学科、多视角切入,研究内容涉及漂流者动机与体验、漂流游憩资源的承载量及价值评估、漂流旅游安全、漂流河流流量、漂流旅游对目的地的影响等方面,研究的广度和深度不断拓展与加强,其基于准确和科学的数据分析的研究结论为漂流旅游开发与管理者提供了有益的理论指导;而国内的漂流旅游研究则停留于实践运作层面,深入、系统的理论探讨较少。最后,指出了我国漂流旅游应拓展研究对象,丰富研究内容;加强定量研究,强化学术规范;获得漂流业界支持,合作开展研究。 As the rafting/kayaking/canoeing tourism is developing constantly at home and abroad, it is increasingly attracting extensive attention from academic circles in the world. This paper has sorted out and analyzed the articles related to rafting/kayaking/canoeing tourism at home and abroad, and reviewed the current research advance of rafting/kayaking/canoeing tourism from aspects of research methods, theories and contents. Rafting/kayaking/canoeing tourism researches abroad are conducted multi-disciplinarily and multi-dimensionally, with objects expanding in scope and depth that cover participating motivation and experience, carrying capacity and resource value assessment, safety, river discharge, effects on destinations, etc. The foreign scholars' researches are mostly based on accurate and scientific data analysis, providing useful theoretical guidance for rafting/kayaking/canoeing tourism developers and managers, while the researches at home still stay at a practical operational level, and the in-depth and systematic theoretical studies are comparatively few. It is expected that this paper would provide references for domestic scholars' research and rafting/kayaking/canoeing practice work.
出处 《热带地理》 北大核心 2013年第1期104-111,118,共9页 Tropical Geography
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41261031 40861005)
关键词 漂流旅游 综述 rafting/kayaking/canoeing tourism review
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Weiss E A. Whitewater medicine[J]. Journal of Wilderness Medicine 1991, 2 ( 3 ): 245-252.
  • 2Shelby B, Brown T C, Baumgartner R. Effects of streamflows on river trips on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona[J]. Rivers, 1992, 3 (3): 191-201.
  • 3Nyaupane G P, Morais D B, Graefe A. A comparison of leisure constraints among three outdoor recreation activities : whitewater rafting, canoeing and overnight horseback riding[M]//Schuster Rudy comp. Proceedings of the 2002 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. General Technical Report NE-302. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 2003: 152-157.
  • 4Emrah Ozesen U Determination of the factors that motivating the sports consumer in the case of daily rafting trip on Melen River[D]. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 2007.
  • 5Morgan O W, Brunette G, Kapella B K, et al. Schistosomiasis among recreational users of upper Nile River, Uganda, 2007[J]. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2010, 16 (5): 866-868.
  • 6Jones C D, Hollenhorst S J, Perna F. An empirical comparison of the four channel flow model and adventure experience paradigm[J]. Leisure Sciences, 2003, 25 ( 1 ): 17-31.
  • 7Tarrant M A, English B K. A crowding-based model of social carrying capacity: applications for whitewater boating use[J]. Journal of Leisure Research, 1996, 28 (3): 155-168.
  • 8Wu Cedric Hsi-Jui, Liang Rong-Da. The relationship between white- water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: a flow theory perspective[J]. Tourism Management, 2011, 32 (2): 317-325.
  • 9Collins K A. Motive importance based on trip outcome, experience level, and group type related to whitewater paddling on the Nantahala River [D]. Bloomington: Indiana University, 2007.
  • 10Wagias W, Morals D, Dziubek D. The role of risk perception a one-day wildness whitewater rafting trip[M]//Peden J G, John G, Schuster R M, et ai. Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. GeneralTechnica]ReportNE-341. Newton Square , PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 2006: 49-47.

二级参考文献57

共引文献76

同被引文献130

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部