期刊文献+

大粗隆钢板结合异体皮质骨板治疗Vancouver B3型股骨假体周围骨折 被引量:8

Treatment of Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture with greater trochanter reattachment device and cortical strut bone allograft
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察应用大粗隆钢板结合异体骨板对Vancouver B3型股骨假体周围骨折进行人工髋关节翻修的疗效。方法回顾性分析2006年1月~2011年1月采用大粗隆钢板结合异体骨板治疗的Vancouver B3型股骨假体周围骨折患者26例,男5例,女21例,55~79岁,平均63.52岁。所有患者均采用Zimmer大粗隆钢板、钛缆,翻修假体均选用Zimmer Wagner长柄假体。以Harris评分标准对患者术前术后髋关节功能进行评估,通过数字化X线摄片技术对假体稳定性、异体骨板愈合情况进行评估。结果 26例患者随访12~35个月,平均25个月,所有患者骨折均愈合,未出现感染、松动、骨折不愈合及畸形愈合。术前Harris评分为(35.26±3.35)分,术后Harris评分为(84.70±6.21)分,其中优5例,良16例,中5例,优良率80.77%。至随访结束,假体稳定,异体骨板愈合良好。结论应用大粗隆钢板结合异体骨板对Vancouver B3型股骨假体周围骨折进行人工髋关节翻修手术操作简便,并发症少,术后髋关节功能恢复良好,短期临床效果满意。 Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture after treating with greater trochanter reattachment device (GTR) and cortical strut bone graft in the prosthesis revision of the total hip arthroplasty. Methods A total of 26 patients were selected from January 2006 to January 2011, including 5 males and 21 females, aged 55 -79 years, 63.52 years on average. All the cases were treated by the Zimmer greater trochanter reattachment device (GTR), and the Zimmer Wagner uncemented long stem. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip functions before and after the operation. Prosthesis stability and the bony union were assessed by the digital radiography. Results All the patients were followed-up for 25 months on average ( 12 - 35 months) after the operation. All the fractures reached union, and there was no infection, stem loosening, nonunion and malunion. The Harris score was (35.26 ± 3.35 ) before the operation, which was improved to (84.70± 6.21 ) after the operation, and the good-to-ex- cellent rate was 80.77% (5 excellent cases, 16 good cases and 5 average cases). X-ray showed that the prosthesis was stable, and the host bone and bone graft achieved bony union. Conclusion The prosthesis revision of the total hip arthroplasty with the greater trochanter reattachment device (GTR) and cortical strut bone graft used for the Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic proximal femur fractures has the advantages of simple manipulation, less complications, good recovery of the hip function and satisfactory results in the short period.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第2期88-92,共5页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 髋关节置换 翻修 假体周围骨折 骨移植 股骨 Hip arthroplasty Revision Periprosthetic fracture Bone graft Femur
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Malkani A L, Lewallen D G, Cabanela M E, et al. Fem- oral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis [J ]. J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11(4) :411-418.
  • 2Ogawa H, Ito Y, Takigami I, et al. Revision total hip ar- throplasty for a Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic fracture using an allograft-cemented stem composite by the telesco- ping technique[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(4): 665. e25-e28.
  • 3Lang J E, Bono J V, Whiddon D R, et al. Stability of re- vision acetabular components using the rim-fit technique [J ] Arthroplasty, 2010, 25(1) :128-132.
  • 4Masri B A, Meek R M, Duncan C P. Periprosthetic frac- tures evaluation and treatment [J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, 420:80-95.
  • 5Ninan T M, Costa M L, Krikler S J. Classification of femoral periprosthetic fractures [ J ]. Injury, 2007, 38 (6) :661-668.
  • 6Judas F, Saavedra M J, Mendes A F, et al. Cortical strut allografting in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery[J ]. Ac- ta Reumatol Port, 2011, 36( 1 ) :24-28.
  • 7Virolainen P, Mokka J, Sepp nen M, et al. Up to 10 years follow up of the use of 71 cortical allografts ( strut- grafts) for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures [J ]. Scand J Surg, 2010, 99(4) :240-243.
  • 8Goldberg V M. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a ce- mentless modular femoral hip design [J ]. Am J Orthop, 2002, 31 (4) : 202-204.
  • 9Nich C, Sedel L. Bone substitution in revision hip re- placement[J ]. Int Orthop, 2006, 30(6) :525-531.
  • 10Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement : repeated DXA studies in 96 hips ran- domized to 3 types of fixation [J ]. Acta Orthop, 2006, 77(2) :218-226.

二级参考文献26

  • 1卢伟杰,廖威明,余楠生,白波,林志雄,吴景明,严广斌.人工全髋关节翻修骨缺损的治疗[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(5):299-301. 被引量:11
  • 2邱贵兴,杨庆铭,余楠生,翁习生,王凯,李晓林.低分子肝素预防髋、膝关节手术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的多中心研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(12):819-822. 被引量:428
  • 3Ollendorf DA,Vera-Llonch M,Oster G.Cost of venous thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery in hospitalized patients.Am J Health Syst Pharm,2002,59(18):1750-1754.
  • 4Geerts WH,Pineo OF,Heir JA,et al.Prevention of venous thromboembolism:the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithromboric and Thrombolytic Therapy.Chest,2004,126 (3 Suppl):S338-400.
  • 5Mosby's Dictionary of Medicine,Nursing & Health Professions.7th ed.St.Louis,MO:Mosby,2006:115-116,335,520,1454,1849,1949.
  • 6Piovella F,Wang CJ,Lu H,et al.Deep-vein thrombosis rates after major Orthopedic surgery in Asia:an epidemiological study based on postoperative screening with centrally adjudicated bilateral venography.J Thromb Haemost,2005,3(12):2664-2670.
  • 7Heir JA,O'Fallon WM,Petterson TM,et al.Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism:a population-based study.Arch Intern Med,2002,162 (11):1245-1248.
  • 8Anderson FA Jr,Spencer FA.Risk factors for venous thrombcembolism.Circulation,2003,107(23 Suppl 1):9-16.
  • 9Caprini JA.Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care.Dis Mon,2005,51(2/3):70-78.
  • 10Geerts WH,Heit JA,Clagett GP,et al.Prevention of venous thromboembolism.Chest,2001,119(1 Suppl):S132-175.

共引文献907

同被引文献73

  • 1蔡谞,方毅,王岩,王睿,王继芳,刘玉杰,周勇刚,李众利,王志刚.人工髋关节置换术预防性抗生素应用时机的临床研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(2):108-111. 被引量:13
  • 2郝跃峰,孙俊英,杨玉生,杨沛彦.经小切口直接外侧入路行全髋置换术[J].江苏医药,2006,32(3):225-226. 被引量:5
  • 3王建云,姜世平,何健飞,蒋兴粒,李俊歧.形状记忆合金环抱器或钛捆绑带治疗髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(5):400-401. 被引量:21
  • 4黄海,卫小春.髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的分型[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(8):475-476. 被引量:12
  • 5Ninan TM, Costa ML, Krikler SJ. Classification of femoral peripros-thetic fractures [J]. Injury,2007,38(6):661-668.
  • 6Kyle RF, Haas JC, Yoon P. Periprosthetic Femur Fractures[A]. In:Wiss Da ed. Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery: Fractures[M]. 2nd ed. USA:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,2006:766-782.
  • 7Lindahl, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Periprosthetic femoral frac-tures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femo-ral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register[J]. J Arthroplasty,2005,20(7):857-865.
  • 8Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H,et al. Three hundred and twen-ty-one periprosthetic femoral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88(6):1215-1222.
  • 9Kobbe P, Klemn R, Reilmann H, et al. Less invasive stabilizationsystem (LISS) for the treatment of periosthetic femoral fracture:狂3-year follow-up [J]. Injury, 2008,39(4):472-479.
  • 10TsiridisE, Narvani AA, Haddad FS,et al. Impaction femoral allo-grafting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2004,86(8): 1124-1132.

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部