期刊文献+

两种微创治疗方案治疗急性结石性胆管炎的临床对照研究 被引量:21

Comparison between Two Approaches for Minimally Invasive Surgery for Acute Calculus Cholangitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查术(LC联合LCBDE)与内镜乳头切开取石联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(EST联合LC)在急性结石性胆管炎治疗中的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2007年3月~2011年9月126例轻度或中度急性结石性胆管炎的临床资料,其中LC联合LCBDE 57例,EST联合LC 69例。对结石清除率、术后并发症、中转开腹率及单次治疗成功率等指标进行比较。结果 2组结石清除率、并发症发生率、中转开腹率差异无显著性,而单次治疗成功率LC联合LCBDE组高于EST联合LC组[89.5%(51/57)vs.75.4%(52/69),χ2=4.166,P=0.041]。所有病例随访0.5~3年,平均1.8年,均未出现腹痛、发热及黄疸等症状,B超未见结石复发。结论 LC联合LCBDE和EST联合LC都是治疗急性结石性胆管炎安全有效的方法,而在减少治疗次数、减轻病人痛苦方面,LC联合LCBDE更有优势。 Objective To compare the efficiency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration (LCBDE + LC) and endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (EST + LC) for acute calculus cholangitis. Methods A retrospective analysis involved totally 126 patients with mild or moderate acute calculus cholangitis, who received minimally invasive surgery in our hospital from March 2007 to September 2011. Among the cases, LCBDE + LC was performed on 57 cases, and EST + LC in the other 69. The stone clearance rate, postoperative complications, rate of conversion to open surgery, and success rate of single-session operation were compared between the two groups. Results No significant difference was detected in the stone clearance rate, postoperative complications, and rate of conversion to open surgery between the two groups ( P 〉 O. 05 ). However, LC + LCBDE group showed a significantly higher success rate of single-session operation than the EST + LC group [ 89.5% (51/57) vs. 75.4% (52/69) , X2 =4. 166, P =0. 041 ]. In both the groups, all the patients received a follow-up for a mean of 1.8 years (ranged from 6 months to 3 years) , during which no abdominal pain, fever, or jaundice were detected, and re-examination by B- ultrasonography showed no recurrent stones. Conclusion Both LC + LCBDE and EST + LC are effective for acute calculus cholangitis, however, with LC + LCBDE, the patients undergo less sessions of operation, and thus suffer less from the surgical procedures.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2013年第1期38-41,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
基金 浙江省基层卫生适宜技术转化应用计划(No:2010ZHB004)
关键词 胆总管结石 急性胆管炎 腹腔镜胆总管探查术 内镜乳头括约肌切开术 Choledocholithiasis Acute cholangitis Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1彭颖,王立新.胆囊结石合并胆总管结石微创治疗方法比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(2):115-117. 被引量:23
  • 2Williams E J,Green J,Beckingham I. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones(CBDS)[J].Gut,2008,(07):1004-1021.doi:10.1136/gut.2007.121657.
  • 3急性胆道系统感染的诊断和治疗指南(2011版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011,10(1):9-13. 被引量:495
  • 4Dindo D,Demartines N,Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications:a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336patients and results of a survey[J].Annals of Surgery,2004,(02):205-213.
  • 5王立新,彭颖,徐智,侯纯升,凌晓锋,陆少美,张同琳,周孝思.胆总管结石的内镜治疗[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(1):43-45. 被引量:37
  • 6张同琳.应当重视保护Oddi括约肌的正常结构和功能[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(2):87-88. 被引量:43
  • 7Gholipour C,Shalchi RA,Abassi M. Efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as primary procedure in acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones[J].Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A,2007,(05):634-638.
  • 8Alhamdani A,Mahmud S,Jameel M. Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2008,(10):2190-2195.doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0021-y.

二级参考文献99

共引文献588

同被引文献177

引证文献21

二级引证文献187

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部