张继科与王皓的接发球技战术比较研究

A Comparative Study on Return of Serve Techniques Between Jike ZHANG and Hao WANG

采用文献资料、录像观察、数理统计等方法,对我国优秀乒乓球运动员张继科与王皓在2011年世界乒乓球锦标赛和世界杯的两场男单决赛共计12局比赛中接发球技战术进行分析,从技术、线路、落点、得失分4个维度对比赛中接发球特征与规律进行对比研究.结果表明:张继科与王皓比赛中接发球都以进攻性技术为主,控制性技术为辅.但王皓控制性技术的使用率高于张继科,而进攻性技术的使用率低于张继科;张继科、王浩接发球技术均以反手拧和摆短为主;张继科接发球线路使用率前三位的是中路、反手直线和反手斜线,王浩接发球线路使用率最多的是中路;张继科在比赛中接发球落点集中控制在中路长球8号位、反手位长球7号位和中路半出台球5号位,王浩在比赛中接发球落点集中控制在中路长球8号位和中路半出台球5号位;王皓在比赛中接发球的得失分率都要比张继科高,说明王皓在比赛中接发球的侵略性、变化要比张继科强,但王皓接发球的稳定性还不够高,失误较多.

This article analyzes the return of serve techniques of the two excellent table tennis players in China, Jike ZHANG and Hao Wang, in the 12 games constituting Men＇s Single Final in both 2011 World Table Tennis Championships and the World Cup. Relying on such sources and means as documentation, video observation and mathematical statistics, the piece of writing has conducted a comparative study on return of serve patterns and characteristics from four dimensions including technique, path, droppoint and goal average. The study has revealed that both Jike ZHANG and Hao WANG give priority to offensive return of serve tactics in matches, supplemented by controlling ones. Nevertheless, Hao WANG adopts more controlling tactics and less offensive ones than Jike ZHANG. While drop shots and backhand twists dominate Jike ZHANG＇s return of serve techniques, backhand twists and drop shots lead those of Hao WANG. With respect to return of serve path, the top three taken by Jike ZHANG table center, back straight and back cross, whereas Hao Wang mainly adopt center. Regarding droppoint, those of Jike ZHANG focus on the 8th middle long shot, the 7th backhand long shot and the 5th middle semi - introduced shot, and those of Hao WANG mainly include the 8th middle long shot and the 5th middle semi - introduced shot. As for goal average, Hao WANG scores higher in respect of both pros and cons, which shows that Hao WANG is more aggressive and flexible than Jike ZHANG concerning return of serve in matches, but is less steady and more prone to miss than the latter.