摘要
在自然法意义上论证制宪权,无法实现历史与逻辑的统一,不可避免地坠入虚妄的超验困境。要理解制宪权的运作及其享有主体,首先得考察制定宪法的社会实践。革命和进化是制宪权的真实运作形态。人民作为制宪权的主体,包含政治哲学和政治实务两个范畴,前者为制宪权提供了正当性归宿和价值基础,后者为制宪权提供了实证支撑和操作平台。
h is inevitable to fall into the false transcendental dilemma when the constituent power is demonstrated in the sense of the natural law and therefore the unification of history and logic can not be realized. To understand the operation and main body of the constituent power, the social practice of constitution must be studied first. Revolution and evolution are the real operation morphology of constituent power. People as the main body of the constituent power contain two categories of political philosophy and political practice. The former provides legitimacy end-resuh and value foundation for the constituent power and the latter provides empirical support and operation platform for the constituent power.
出处
《河南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第4期76-79,87,共5页
Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社科基金项目(12CFX021)
教育部人文社科规划项目(10YJA820075)
上海海事大学科研基金项目(20110069)
关键词
宪法
制宪权
自然法
人民
革命
constitution
constituent power
natural law
people
revolution