期刊文献+

平等的资源主义分析路径的内在张力--罗纳德·德沃金的化解及其困境

The Tension of Resourcism Approach of Equality——Ronald Dworkin's Settlement and Its Plight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 平等的资源主义分析路径是当代政治哲学中的平等理论的一种重要分析进路,罗纳德.德沃金所建构的名为"资源平等"的分配正义理论是其中的代表性理论之一。资源平等的理论目标是"敏于抱负"和"钝于禀赋",实际上,这两种理论目标之间有一种内在的张力,"敏于抱负"与"钝于禀赋"相互消解。德沃金在一定程度上意识到了其平等的资源主义分析路径的内在张力,并试图以"虚拟保险市场"来化解它。德沃金的这一尝试是值得商榷的,原因主要在于虚拟保险市场既不能实现"敏于抱负",又不能实现"钝于禀赋"。 Resourcism approach of Equality is an important approach to the theory of equality in contemporary political philosophy,and Ronald Dworkin's equality of resources is one of the representative theories.The target of equality of resources is 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive'.In fact,there is a tension between 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive',that is to say,'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive' eliminate mutually.Ronald Dworkin partly recognizes that there is a conflict between 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive',and he tries to solve it by the hypothetical insurance market.Ronald Dworkin doesn't successfully solve the tension,because the hypothetical insurance market can't realize 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive'.
作者 高景柱
出处 《政治思想史》 2012年第4期139-155,199,共17页 Journal of the History of Political Thought
基金 天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(项目编号:TJZZ11-031) 天津市高等学校人文科学研究重点项目(项目编号:2010ZD04)
关键词 平等 资源平等 虚拟保险市场 罗纳德·德沃金 equality equality of resources hypothetical insurance market Ronald Dworkin
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献52

  • 1Elizabeth S. Anderson, "What is the Point of Equality?" Ethics, Vol. 109, No. 2, 1999, pp.288-290.
  • 2Jeremy Moss, "Against Fairness: Egalitarianism and Re- sponsibility," The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 41, 2007, p. 309.
  • 3Ronald Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard University Press, 2000, pp.79-80, p.73, pp.322-323, pp.298-299, p.91, pp.82-83, p. 286, p.92.
  • 4Kristin Voigt, "The Harness Objection: Is Luck Egalitari- anism Too Harsh on the Victims of Option Luck?" Ethic Theory Moral Prac, Vol. 10, 2007, p. 394.
  • 5Nicholas Barry, "Defending Luck Egalitarianism," Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2006, p. 97.
  • 6Nicholas Barry, "Reassessing Luck Egalitarianism," The Journal of Politics, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2008, pp. 136-150.
  • 7John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971, pp. 62-63.
  • 8Richard J. Arneson, "Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritari- anism," Ethics, Vol. 113, No. 1, 2000, pp. 339-349.
  • 9Derek Parfit, "Equality and Priority," Ratio (new series), X3, 0034-0006, 1997, p.213.
  • 10Larry Alexander; Mainon Schwarzschild, "Liberalism, Neutrality, and Equality of Welfare vs. Equality of Resources," Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 16, No.I, 1987, pp. 99-103.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部