对无权处分合同效力的再思考——从无权处分人和相对人的主观方面分析

Rethink the Effect of the Unauthorized Disposition Contract——From the Subjective Aspect of Non-entitled Party and Counterpart

关于无权处分合同的效力问题,我国学者众说纷纭,其主要观点为效力待定说、无效说和有效说这三种。笔者认为这些学说或多或少都存在着一些武断的地方,有待进一步商榷。笔者通过对已有的三种主要学说进行较为详细的评析之后,认为从无权处分人和相对人的主观方面对无权处分合同的效力进行再思考,可以得出无权处分合同的效力可能为无效、可撤销或有效的结论。

When the effect of the unauthorized disposition contract in present,Chinese scholars have many different opinions,which mainly perform three kinds：undecided effect,void and valid.However,there are some arbitrary places more or less in these theories,which need to be further discussed.In view of this,this article firstly gives more detailed analysis of the theories above,then blaze a trail to rethink the effect of the unauthorized disposition contract from the subjective aspect of non-entitled party and counterpart.As a result,we can draw a conclusion that the effect of the unauthorized disposition contract may be void,voidable and valid.