期刊文献+

动态条件下的高风险系统安全合作行为主观博弈研究——以“7·23”甬温线动车事故为例 被引量:2

Subjective Game Analysis of Safety Cooperative Behavior in High-risk-system under Dynamic Conditions——A Case of "7·23" Yongwen Line Railway Accident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探索动态条件对高风险系统安全合作行为效率的影响,将动态成本因素引入演化博弈分析过程,构建一类主观博弈模型。以"7.23"甬温线动车事故为例,运用数值仿真方法分析事故演化过程及原因。结果显示,安全行为成本随时间递增且不利于系统安全。技术人员和运营人员均存在由人机替代效应导致的"搭便车"现象,且前者的"搭便车"问题更突出。提出加强人工控制应急演练、增加安全冗余并严惩"搭便车"现象、加强技术人员的责任认定、运用多媒体手段增强人员风险意识等4项建议。 To explore the relationship between dynamic conditions and efficiency of safety cooperative behavior in the high-risk-system, the dynamic cost factor was introduced in evolutionary game analysis process, and a subjective game model was built. The "7 ~ 23" Yongwen Line Railway Accident was taken as a case. By using numerical simulation methods, the evolution process of and reasons for accident were analyzed. The results show that cost of safe behavior increases with time progressively, and is unfavorable to the system safety, and that phenomena of hitching a lift occur among both technology personnel and oper- ations personnel, especially among the former. Finally, suggestions were given such as doing emergency response exercise, increasing redundancy, strengthening the responsibility of technical staff, using multi- media tools to enhance staff awareness of risks.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期10-16,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 铁道部科技研究开发计划重大课题资助项目(2011G010-D)
关键词 动态成本 人机替代 安全管理 合作行为 主观博弈 甬温动车事故 dynamic cost human-machine replacement safety management cooperative behavior subjective game Yongwen line railway accident
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献140

共引文献1508

同被引文献27

  • 1刘常昱,李德毅,杜鹢,韩旭.正态云模型的统计分析[J].信息与控制,2005,34(2):236-239. 被引量:210
  • 2代宝乾,汪彤,蒋玉琨,丁辉.地铁运营系统安全综合评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(12):9-14. 被引量:22
  • 3[德]马丁·韦尔特纳.德国铁路事故大事记[M].中国中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,译.北京:中国铁道出版社,2010:92-100.
  • 4Dunj 0 J. Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis: A literature review [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173(1) :19 -32.
  • 5WANG Hang-zhou, CHEN Bing-zhen, HE Xiao-rong.SDG-based HAZOP analysis of operating mistakes for PVC process[JT. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009,87 (1) :40 - 46.
  • 6Johnson R W. Beyond-compliance uses of HAZOP/LOPA studies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Indus- tries,2010, 23(6):727 -733.
  • 7中华人民共和国铁道部.铁路技术管理规程[L].2007-04一01.
  • 8Luciano Burgazzi, Evaluation of uncertainties related to passive systems performance [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design ,2004,230(1/3) :93 - 106.
  • 9Cozzani V, Bonvicini S, Spadoni G, et al. Hazmat transport : A methodological framework for the risk analysis of marshal- ling yards[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2007,147(1/2) :412 -423.
  • 10F I Khan. Knowledge-based expert system framework to conduct offshore process HAZOP study[ C]. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics ,2005:2 274 -2 280.

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部