中日钓鱼岛之争中的有效统治证据分量考

An Analysis of Effectiveness of the Effective Administration in the Diaoyu Islands Dispute between China and Japan

有效统治作为一国对争议区域行使主权活动的行为,已经引起越来越多国家的重视。但是,有效统治并非一种法律权利,当有效统治行为与体现权原的权利发生冲突时,后者处于优先的地位;而且,有效的国际条约具有决定性分量。同样,中日钓鱼岛列岛争端中所涉及的相关条约应具有优先性。但是,不应忽视历史证据,尤其是有效统治证据的分量。为了巩固我国对钓鱼岛列岛享有的历史主权,必须采取各种有效统治措施,进一步彰显主权。

Effective administration taken as a behavior to effectively exercise sovereign jurisdiction, has been at- tached great importance to its weight by more and more countries. However, the effective administration is by no means a legal right, when effective administration behavior clashes with the right embodying the source right the latter prevails. Moreover, the effective international treaties prevails over any other written evidence, being deci- sively weighty. At the same time, treaties involved Diaoyu Islands dispute between China and Japan should pre- vails over any other written evidence. Nevertheless, we should not neglect weight of historic evidence , especially the weight of evidence of effective administration. In order to consolidate the historical sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands, China should adopt various measures of effective administration to further highlight China＇ s sovereignty.