期刊文献+

云南2型糖尿病家系人群中糖尿病视网膜病变的患病情况分析 被引量:2

Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Families in Yunnan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解昆明地区2型糖尿病家系人群中糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的患病情况以及家族遗传方式.方法以昆明医科大学第一附属医院糖尿病科2010年1月至2011年1月门诊或住院的昆明地区有糖尿病家族史的T2DM患者为先证者,汉族,收集T2DM家系共19个,具有血缘关系的家系成员共147例.采用调查问卷形式,回顾性询问家系中3代成员糖尿病、高血压及其他特殊疾病的患病情况,并记录所有研究对象的一般临床资料,包括年龄、性别、糖尿病史及其家族史、吸烟史和高血压病史等.结果 (1)19个T2DM家系147例家系人群中,DR的患病率为22.45%,其中新诊断T2DM伴DR者2例(2/147);(2)先证者中、一级亲属中、二级亲属中DR患病率分别为57.89%、22.11%、3.03%;(3)女性DR的患病率(17.69%)高于男性(4.76%).先证者母亲DR的患病率高(83.33%),同胞中兄弟和姐妹DR的患病率之间无统计学意义(P>0.05);(4)NGT、IGR和T2DM组年龄分别为(33.13±18.15)岁、(54.43±11.35)岁和(56.15±11.98)岁;年龄在IGR组和NGT组、T2DM组和NGT组之间均具有明显统计学意义(P<0.01);(5)先证者、一级亲属和二级亲属年龄分别为(52.58±10.27)岁、(47.65±17.17)岁和(21.94±14.32)岁;年龄在先证者组和二级亲属组、一级和二级亲属组之间具有统计学意义(P<0.05).先证者伴DR组和先证者的同胞伴DR组的患病年龄分别为(58.09±7.71)岁、(56.09±3.99)岁;年龄在2组人群中无统计学意义(P>0.05);(6)DR人群中年龄≥50岁达90%以上,尤50~70岁居多.先证者伴DR者的年龄<50岁有1名,50~60岁有5名,61~70岁有5名;先证者T2DM同胞伴DR者的年龄50~60岁有9名,61~70岁有2名;两组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);(7)DR人群中糖尿病病程5~10a者达50%.先证者伴DR者糖尿病病程<5a者5名,5~10年者6名;先证者T2DM同胞伴DR者糖尿病病程<5a者7名,5~10a者4名;两组人群糖尿病病程构成无统计学意义(P=0.392,P>0.05).(8)家系中≥2名DR者的家系占47.4%,先证者母亲为DR的家系有10个.结论 (1)T2DM家系人群中DR的患病率为22.45%,新诊断T2DM伴DR者的患病率为1.36%;(2)女性DR的患病率高于男性,且先证者母亲DR的患病率高,同胞中DR的患病率无性别差异;(3)T2DM家系人群中血缘级别越低DR的患病率越低,且先证者同胞DR的患病年龄提前;(4)DR人群以老年人居多,其糖尿病病程至少≥5a.(5)DR的发病可能具有家族聚集性,母系遗传可能是本家系研究人群的重要特征. Objective To detect the prevalence and the genetic pattern of DR in type 2 diabetes mellitus families in Kunming. Methods We selected T2DM outpatients or inpatients with family history of diabetes in Han nationality as probands from Diabetes Department in the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University inKunming, from January 2010 to January 2011. We collected 19 T2DM families with a total of 147 different-pedigree family members. Then we retrospectively recorded the clinical data from all subjects with questionnaires, including the history of diabetes/hypertension and other special diseases, as well as age, sex, family history, smoking history and hypertension history. Results (1) In 19 families of 147 folks, two cases were of newly diagnosed T2DM with DR (2/147) and the prevalence of DR in the population was 22.45%. (2) The prevalence of DR in probands, first-degree relatives and second-degree relatives were 57.89%, 22.11% and 3.03%, respectively. (3) The prevalence of DR was higher in women (17.69%) than in men (4.76%). The prevalence in mothers of probands with DR was very high (83.33%) , and there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of DR be- tween brothers and sisters in siblings (P 〉 0.05 ). (4) The ages of subjects in NGT, IGR and T2DM group were (33.13 ± 18.15), (54.43 ±11.35) and (56.15 ± 11.98) years old, respectively; there was statistieally signif- icant difference in ages between the IGR group and NC, T group, T2DM group and NGT group (P 〈 0.01) (5) The ages of probands, first-degree relatives and second-degree relatives were (52.58 ± 10.27) , (47.65 ± 17.17) and (21.94 ± 14.32) years old, respectively; there was statistically significant difference between probands and first-degree relatives, first-degree relatives and second-degree relatives (P 〈 0.05 ). The ages of T2DM probands with DR and the T2DM siblings with DR were respectively (58.09 ± 7.71) and (56.09 ±3.99) years old; there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). (6) The subjects with Age I〉 50 years old accounted for for more than 90% of the DR population, especially the majority of 50 to 70 years old. (7) The patients with the duration of diabetes of 5 to 10 years accounted for 50% in DR population. There were 5 probands with DR with the duration of diabetes less than 5 years and 6 probands with DR with the duration of dia- betes of 5-10 years; There were 7 siblings with T2DM and DR of probands with the duration of diabetes less than 5 years and 4 with the duration of diabetes of 5-10 years ; there was no statistically significant difference in the dura- tion of diabetes between two groups (P = 0.392, P 〉 0.05 ). (8) The number of families with 1〉 2 DR patients ac- counted for 47.4%. The number of families with mothers of DR as probands was 10. Conclusion (1) The preva- lence of newly diagnosed T2DM with DR is 1.36% and the prevalence of DR is 22.45%. (2) The prevalence of DR is higher in women than in men. The prevalence in mothers of probands with DR is high, and there is no statistically significant difference between brothers and sisters in siblings with DR. (3) The further the kinship of the population is, the lower prevalence of DR is. Compared to the T2DM probands with DR, the T2DM siblings with DR is in ad- vance. (4) The DR population are mostly the older crowd, the duration of diabetes of which are at least ≥ 5 years. (5) DR may happen in a familial aggregation way, and maternal inheritance is an important feature of the study population.
出处 《昆明医科大学学报》 CAS 2012年第12期79-83,106,共6页 Journal of Kunming Medical University
基金 云南省自然科学基金资助项目(2009CD086)
关键词 2型糖尿病家系 糖尿病视网膜病变 患病率 Type 2 diabetes mellitus families Diabetic retinopathy Prevalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1LESLIE R D,PYKE D A. Diabetic retinopathy in identicaltwins[j]. Diabetes, 1982,31(1): 19 - 21.
  • 2王劲松,周玲,成金罗,沈默宇.2型糖尿病家系的遗传异质性研究[J].中国公共卫生,2004,20(9):1029-1030. 被引量:7
  • 3中华医学会眼科学会眼底病学组.糖尿病视网膜病变分期标准.中华眼科杂志,1985,(21):113-113.
  • 4阳桥生.糖尿病性视网膜病变的诊断[J].医学综述,2009,15(3):426-428. 被引量:18
  • 5邹海东,张皙,朱剑锋,汪枫桦,许迅,王伟伟,吴美芳.上海市北新泾街道糖尿病患者视网膜病变的患病率调查[J].中华眼底病杂志,2006,22(1):31-34. 被引量:82
  • 6MCKAY R,MCCARTY C A,TAYLOR H R. Diabetic re-tinopathy in Victoria,Australia:the Visual Impairment Pro-ject[j], BrJ Ophthalmol ,2000,84:865 - 870.
  • 7VARMA R,TORTS M,PENA F,et al. Los angeles latinoeye study group, prevalence of diabetic retinopathy inadult latincs : the los angeles latino eye study [ J]. Ophthal-mology,2004,111 : 1 298 - 1 306.
  • 8WONG T Y,KLEIN R, ISLAM F M, et al. Diabetic retino-pathy in a multiethnic cohort in the united states [j]. Am JOphthalmol, 2006,141:446 - 455.
  • 9WONG T Y,CHEUNG N,TAY W T,et al. Prevalence andrisk factors for diabetic retinopathy: the Singapore malay eyestudy[j]. Ophthalmology,2008,115 : 1 869 - 1 875.
  • 10陈素梅,王伯秀,程瑞奋,林舟桥,方春庭.温州沿海居民糖尿病患者视网膜病变流行病学调查[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2006,16(11):719-720. 被引量:6

二级参考文献66

共引文献214

同被引文献52

  • 1富琳岩,王丽敏,吉桂萍.达斡尔族人群糖尿病流行病学调查分析[J].中国基层医药,2003,10(11):80-81. 被引量:2
  • 2杜群,石福彦,丁奇龙,李子玲,宋颖,贾凤英.空腹血糖受损、糖耐量受损人群2年自然转归及其影响因素的研究[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2004,20(3):223-226. 被引量:94
  • 3梁先军,林荚杰,黄智,李国培,吴晓云.佛山市糖尿病视网膜病变患病率及高危因素的研究[J].广东医学,2006,27(10):1552-1553. 被引量:13
  • 4Grassi MA, Tikhomirov A, Ramalingam S, et al. Replication a- nalysis for severe diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(4) : 2377-2381.
  • 5Kuo JZ, Wong TY, Rotter JI. Challenges in elucidating the genet- ics of diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014, 132 ( 1 ) : 96-107.
  • 6The Diabetes Control, Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabe- tes mellitus. N Eng J Med, 1993, 329(14) : 977-986.
  • 7UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with con- ventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet, 1998, 352(9131): 837-853.
  • 8Traynor BJ. The era of genomic epidemiology. Neuroepidemiolo- gy, 2009, 33(3) : 276-279.
  • 9Benke KS, Fallin MD. Methods: genetic epidemiology. Chn Lab Med, 2010, 30(4) : 795-814.
  • 10Traynor BJ. The era of genomic epidemiology. Neuroepidemiolo- gy, 2009,33(3) : 276-279.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部