期刊文献+

从演绎作品的原创性看演绎权的侵犯 被引量:4

Analyzing the Infringement of Derivative Rights as Seen from the View of Derivative Work's Originality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 原创性是演绎作品受版权法保护的核心要件。为判断演绎作品的原创性,法院发展出"超过微小变化"标准和"两分法"标准。由于演绎权是作者创作演绎作品或授权他人创作演绎作品的权利,因此,演绎作品的原创性标准,不可避免地会影响到演绎权的侵权认定。司法实践中,法院应要求非法演绎作品具有原创性,才构成对作者演绎权的侵犯。就作者演绎权而言,演绎作品的原创性是一把双刃剑:一方面,"两分法"标准使演绎作者的版权依附于原作者的演绎权;另一方面,"超过微小变化"标准又将创作"微小变化"作品的行为排除在侵权之外。 Originality is the core qualification for the derivative work to be protected by copyright act.There are two standards for the courts to determine whether a derivative work has originality:one is the standard of "more than merely trivial changes",and the other is the standard of "dichotomy method".Derivative rights is an important property right,which means the author can translate or adapt his work and forbid others from translating or adapting his work.So,the originality of derivative work will inevitably influence the infringement of derivative right.If a work does not have originality,then even it is illegal,courts should not find it infringe the author's derivative rights.As far as the author's derivative rights is concerned,the originality of derivative work is a double-edged sword: for one thing,the standard of "dichotomy method" makes the subsequent author's copyright depend on the original author's derivative rights;for another,the standard of "more than merely trivial changes" excludes the creation of merely trivial changes out of infringement.
作者 孙玉芸
出处 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2013年第1期86-90,共5页 Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 江西省社会科学"十一五"规划项目"演绎作品著作权保护研究"(10FX35)
关键词 演绎作品 原创性 演绎权 derivative work originality derivative rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1孙玉芸.论非法演绎作品的法律保护[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,43(5):79-83. 被引量:9
  • 2Steven S.Boyd. Deriving Originality in Derivative Works:Considering the Quantum of Originality Needed to Attain Copyright Protection in a Derivative Work[J].Santa Clara L Rev,2000,(40):325.
  • 3Paul Goldstein. Derivate Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright[J].J Copyright Soc'y U S A,1983,(30):209.
  • 4Michael Abramowicz. A Theory of Copyright' s Derivative Right and Related Doctrines[J].Minnesota Law Review,2005,(90):317.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Natalie, Heineman. Computer Software Derivative Works: The Calm before the Storm [ J ]. High Teeh. Law Journal, 2008(8) :205.
  • 2Paul, Goldstein. Derivate Rights and Derivative Works inCopyright[ J]. Copyright Soc'y U. S. A Journal, 1983 ( 30 ) : 209.
  • 3Sheldon v. Metro - Goldwyn Pictures Corporation. 309U. S. 390,1940.
  • 4Melville B Nimmer, David Nimmer. Nimmer on Copyright [ M ]. New York: Matthew & Bender Company,2005:6.
  • 5Benjamin, Kaplanan. Unhurried View of Copyright [ M ]. New York: Lexis Nexis Matthew & Bender,2005:56.
  • 6I Christine, Wallace. Overlapping Interests in Derivative Works and Compilations [ J ]. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1985 (35) : 103.
  • 7Robert J Morrison. Deriver' s Licenses : An Argument for Es- tablishing a Statutory License for Derivative Works [ J ]. Chi. - Kent J. Intellectual Property, 2006 (6) : 87.
  • 8Peter J Settle. Underlying Copyright Renewal and Derivative Works : Abend v. MCA, Inc. , 863 F. 2d 1465 ( 9th Cir. 1988) [J]. U. Cin. Law Review,1990(58) :1069.
  • 9Curtis. Caveat Emptor in Copyright:A Practical Guide to the Termination of Transfer Provisions of the New Copyright Code[J]. Bull. Copyright Soc'y ,1977(25) :19.
  • 10黄汇.非法演绎作品保护模式论考[J].法学论坛,2008,23(1):129-135. 被引量:31

共引文献8

同被引文献118

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部