摘要
阐述了目前在欧洲两种治理债务危机的思路发生的激烈碰撞;其中以"紧缩换援助"的治理债务危机思路遭到许多经济学家的质疑和希腊等重灾国的激烈反对,以促进结构改革和经济增长来摆脱欧债危机的主张正在获得越来越多的支持;指出欧盟必须适时转变治理危机的思路,并从五个方面提出治理危机的措施,尝试为欧债危机的解决找到出路。
Since the European sovereign debt crisis broke out in Greece at the end of 2009, the EU and the euro -area member states have adopted a series of response measures so as to prevent the spread of the crisis, but the rescue plan does not help ease the current tension. The European debt crisis continues to deepen. Recently, the European debt crisis has intensified, dragging the European banking sector into a liquidity crisis, and showed a trend spreading from the pe- ripheral countries to the core. The continued spread of the European debt crisis not only threatens the stability of the euro area, but also brings the uncertainty to the global economic recovery. How will European countries get rid of the plight of the debt crisis has become the focus of world attention. In Europe, there is a fierce collision between two inconsistent i- deas of the governance of the debt crisis. The idea of "austerity for assistance" to govern the debt crisis is being ques- tioned by many economists and opposed fiercely by those worst -hit countries like Greece while the claim to get rid of the debt crisis in Europe by promoting structural reform and economic growth is gaining more and more support. The Eu- ropean Union must transform the idea of the governance of the crisis in a timely manner to find the ultimate way out for the solution of the sovereign debt crisis.
出处
《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期1-8,64,共9页
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
关键词
欧洲
主权债务危机
起因
演进
治理
Europe
sovereign debt crisis
origins
emergence
governance