期刊文献+

颈椎单开门OsteoMedM3钉板内固定椎管扩大成形术的生物力学研究 被引量:3

Biomechanics of expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty of the cervical spine with OsteoMed M3 plate and screws
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察在单开门术中应用OsteoMedM3钉板内固定重建颈椎稳定性的效果。方法6具新鲜颈椎标本,对每一标本先后行完整颈椎组、后路单开门OsteoMedM3钉板内固定组、后路椎板切除组、后路椎板切除加侧块钉棒内固定组的三维运动范围测试。结果行后路钢板内固定组,在前屈(22.65±2.39)、后伸(15.63±1.56)、左侧弯(19.83±3.16)、右侧弯(16.90±2.13)及右旋(19.45±3.00)状态下运动范围与椎板切除组及侧块钉棒组之间的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),与正常组的运动范围接近,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);在左旋(20.67±2.89)状态下运动范围与其他各组之间的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。椎板切除及侧块钉棒组与其他各组之间的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论在单开门术中应用OsteoMed M3钉板内固定具有良好的生物力学性能,可重建颈椎稳定性。 Objective To investigate the stability of cervical vertebrae of the method for that OsteoMed M3 titanium plate and screws were used to secure the posterior elements in the open position after expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty. Methods Six human cadaveric specimens were harvested freshly, and the range of motion of different groups was measured by a three-dimensional spinal stability test, including intact cervical specimens group, laminoplasty with plate group, laminectomy group, and laminectomy and fusion group. Results After expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty, the plate group exhibited a more significant difference in angular motion than in laminectomy group, and laminectomy and fusion group in ROM of flexion (22. 65 ±2. 39), extension ( 15.63 + 1.56), left lateral bending ( 19. 83±3. 16 ), right lateral bending ( 16. 90 ± 2. 13 ) and right axial rotation ( 19.45 ± 3.00) ( P 〈 0. 05 ), and it was not significantly different from intact cervical specimens group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The plate group exhibited a more significant difference in angular motion than other groups in ROM of left axial rotation (20. 67 ±2. 89 ) ( P 〈 0.05 ). Laminectomy group, and laminectomy and fusion group exhibited a diference in angular motion in all directions (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The biomechanical performance of expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty with OsteoMed M3 plate and screws was excellent, and could remain initial stability of cervical vertebrae.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期129-131,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 广东省科技计划资助项目(20118031300027)
关键词 椎管扩大成形 内固定 生物力学 Expansive laminoplasty Internal fixation Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1陈庄洪,蔡贤华,黄继锋,徐峰,刘曦明,余伦红.寰枢椎后方经关节螺钉内固定的应用解剖与临床研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(2):159-160. 被引量:18
  • 2Kim SM,Lim TJ,Patemo J,et al.Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability.J Neurosurg,2004,100:277 -283.
  • 3Nogueira-Barbosa MH,Defino HLA.Multiplanar reconstructions of helical computed tomography in planning of atlanto-axial transarticular fixation.Eur Spine J,2005,14:493-500.
  • 4Anderson LD,D' Alonzo RT.Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1974,56:1663-1665.
  • 5Richter M,Schmidt R,Claes L,et al.Posterior atlantoaxial fixation:biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques.Spine,2002,27:1724-1732.
  • 6Panjabi M.The stabilizing system of the spine.Part Ⅱ.Neutral zone and instability hypothesis.J Spinal Diasord,1992,5:390-397.
  • 7Grob D,Crisco JJ,Panjabi MM.Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.Spine,1992,17:480-490.
  • 8Vaccaro AR,Ring D,Lee RS,et al.Salvage anterior C1-C2 screw fixation and arthrodesis through the lateral approach in a patient with a symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.Orthop,1997,26:349-353.
  • 9Umberto A,Luciano M.Acute combination fracture of atlas and axis:"triple" anterior screw fixaton in a 92-yesr-old man technical note.Surgical Neurology,2006,65:58-62.
  • 10Vaccaro AR,Lehman AP,Ahlgren BD,et al.Anterior C1-C2 screw fixation and bony fusion through an anterior retropharyngeal approach.Orthop,1999,22:1161-1170.

共引文献5

同被引文献31

  • 1Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, et al. Anterior approach versus posterior ap- proach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy : a systemic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. Eur Spine J,2013,22 (7) : 1583-1593.
  • 2Ito M, Nagahama K. Laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy [ J ]. Global Spine J,2012,2 (3) : 187-194.
  • 3Nishida N, Kato Y, Imajo Y, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the influence of dynamic factors and mor- phometry of the spinal cord[ Jl. J Spinal Cord Med,2012,35 (4) : 256-261.
  • 4Singh A, Tetreauh L, Fehlings MG, et al. Risk factors for development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy:results of a systematic review [ J ]. Evid Based Spine Care J,2012,3(3) :35-42.
  • 5Puttlitz CM, Deviren V, Smith JA, et al. Biomechanics of cervical laminoplasty:kinetic studies comparing different surgical techniques, temporal effects and the degree of level involvement[ J]. Eur Spine J, 2004,13(3) :213-221.
  • 6Heller JG, Raich AL, Dettori JR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of different types of cervical laminoplasty[J]. Evid Based Spine Care J, 2013,4(2) :105-115.
  • 7Kiely PD, Quinn JC, Du JY, et al. Posterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article. HSS J, 2015, 11(1): 36-42.
  • 8Radcliff KE, Limthongku W, Kepler CK, et al. Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2014, 27(2): 86-92.
  • 9Tashjian VS, Kohan E, McArthur DL, et al. The relationship between preoperative cervical alignment and postoperative spinal cord drift after decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol, 2009, 72(2): 112-117.
  • 10林建聪,王少波,郑亚才,王圣林.单开门颈椎管扩大术后脊髓后移的MRI测量及具临床意义[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(3):224-225. 被引量:4

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部