期刊文献+

嗡蜣螂属Onthophagus十二种蜣螂线粒体COⅠ基因的DNA条形码研究 被引量:2

Application of DNA barcoding to mtDNA COⅠ genes in 12 dung beetle (Onthophagus) species
原文传递
导出
摘要 对嗡蜣螂属Onthophagus12种蜣螂的线粒体COI基因3’端部分序列(731bp)进行了比较,结果显示,C01序列的变异位点213个,简约信息位点167个。碱基替代主要发生在第3位点(64次),占替代总数的83.12%。除掘嗡蜣螂0.fodiens与婪嗡蜣螂0.1enzi小于2%外,其余种问遗传距离在8.1%~15.8%之间,种内遗传距离为0~0.2%。单倍型多样性(Hd)和核苷酸序列多样性(Pi)分别为0.944±0.030和0.105184-0.0045。滑动窗口分析表明,可变位点频率在240~290bp、675bp附近较高。NJ树聚类结果与传统形态学分类相吻合:外群代表种分化最早,种间聚成一分支,种内个体优先聚集种下。本文认为COl基因适合作为嗡蜣螂属物种鉴定的DNA条形码。 The DNA sequences of 12 dung beetle species from the genus Onthophagus were compared using a molecular marker of the 3'end fragment(731 bp) of the mitochondrial DNA COI gene. 213 variable sites and 167 parsimony information sites were identified. Base substitution mainly occurred on the third codon (64 times) , accounting for 83. 12% of all substitutions. Interspecific divergence spanned from 8. 1% to 15. 8% , with the exception of the genetic distance between O. fodiens and O. lenzi which was below 2% , and intraspecific variation varied from 0 to 0.2%. Haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (Pi) were 0. 944 _+ 0. 030 and 0. 10518 _+ 0. 0045, respectively. Two sliding windows analyses demonstrated that the frequency of variable sites for all sequences located within 240 - 290 bp and approximately 675 bp was high. NJ phylogenetic tree revealed that molecular clusters was consistent with the traditional taxonomy based on morphological characteristics. The outgroup lineages separate first from the phylogenetic tree. Interspecific specimens clustered in one branch with intraspecific specimens clustered according to species and that branch. These results indicate that COI gene barcoding can reliably identify species of the genus Onthophagus.
出处 《应用昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期108-117,共10页 Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology
基金 辽宁省科技厅攻关计划项目(2008214001) 辽宁省自然科学基金(201102157)
关键词 DNA条形码 嗡蜣螂属 COI基因 分类鉴定 DNA barcodes, Onthophagus, COI gene, taxonomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Ahrens D,Monaghan MT,Vogler AP. DNA-based taxonomy for associating adults and larvae in multi-species assemblages of chafers(Coleoptera:Scarabaeidae)[J].Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2007,(01):436-449.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.024.
  • 2Avise JC. Phylogeography:The History and Formation of Species[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts London,England:Harvard University Press,2000.447-448.
  • 3Burland TG. DNASTAR' s Lasergene sequence analysis software[J].Methods in Molecular Biology,2000.71-91.
  • 4Davis AJ,Sutton SL. A dung beetle that feeds on fig:implications for the measurement of species rarity[J].Journal of Tropical Ecology,1997.759-776.
  • 5Desalle R,Egan MG,Siddall M. The unholy trinity:taxonomy,species delimitation,and DNA barcoding[J].Phil Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci,2005.1905-1916.
  • 6Emlen DJ,Marangelo J,Ball B,Cunningham CW. Diversity in the weapons of sexual selection:Horn evolution in the beetle genus Onthophagus(Coleoptera:Scarabaeidae)[J].Evolution,2005,(05):1060-1084.
  • 7Frézal L,Leblois R. Four years of DNA barcoding:Current advances and prospects[J].Infection,Genetics and Evolution,2008.
  • 8Grebennikov VV,Ballerio A,Ocampo FC,Scholtz CH. Larvae of Ceratocanthidae and Hybosoridae(Coleoptera:Scarabaeoidea):study of morphology,phylogenetic analysis and evidence of paraphyly of Hybosoridae[J].Systematics Entomology,2004,(04):524-543.doi:10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004.00257.x.
  • 9Hajibabaei M,Smith MA,Janzen DH,Rodriguez JJ Whitfield J Hebert PDN. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded[J].Molecular Ecology Notes,2006,(04):959-964.doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01470.x.
  • 10Hebert PDN,Cywinska A,Ball SL,deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2003,(1512):313-321.

二级参考文献110

共引文献212

同被引文献37

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部