期刊文献+

股骨头钻孔减压孔径对股骨颈生物力学影响的实验研究 被引量:2

Effects of different tunnel sizes of femoral head core decompression on femoral neck biomechanics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察经转子间股骨头减压钻孔的孔径对股骨颈生物力学的影响。方法取新鲜尸体股骨标本24具,随机分成4组:正常组、单孔减压组(D=10 mm)、双孔减压组(D=7 mm)和3孔减压组(D=7 mm)。在股骨颈主张力侧、主压力侧和小转子处各选择1点作为应变测试点,检测4组标本在,0~1200 N分级载荷下各测点的应变。结果在股骨颈主张力侧和主压力侧的测试点中,单孔减压组、双孔减压组和3孔减压组的应变值均大于正常组,其中双孔减压组的应变值在三组钻孔组间最小,并且与其它组间相比差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论经转子间股骨头钻孔减压明显影响股骨颈生物力学性能,与单纯大孔钻孔面积相同的2小孔钻孔减压对股骨颈生物力学性能影响较小。 Objective To observe the effects of different tunnel sizes of the femoral head core decompression on femoral neck biomechanics. Methods 24 fresh cadaver femur specimens were randomly divided into four groups: a normal group, a single-tunnel core decompression group (D=10 mm), a 2-tunnel core decompression group (D=7mm) and a 3- tunnel core decompression group (D=7mm). 3 points in main tension side, main pressure side and the lesser trochanter were chosen as the test points of strain from ON to 1200N load. Results The strain of the 2-tunnel group was the lowest among the normal group, the single-tunnel group, 2-tunnel group and 3-tunnel group; furthermore, the strain values of all of the 3 core decompression groups were larger than that in the normal group in tension side and the pressure side. Conclusion There is a significant effect on the femoral neck biomechanics by femoral head core decompression. The 2-tunnel (D= 7mm) with the lowest strain value may be the best choice to femoral head core decompression.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期100-103,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
基金 宁波市医学科技计划项目(2010B04)
关键词 股骨颈 钻孔减压 应变 生物力学 Femoral neck Core decompression Strain Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献44

共引文献56

同被引文献13

  • 1赵卫东,李鉴轶,张美超,黄文华.现实与虚拟互动的骨科生物力学研究方法探讨[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2003,21(3):297-298. 被引量:11
  • 2鞠杨,陈永兰,孙华飞,宋振铎.股骨形态及应力应变的三维有限元分析[J].力学与实践,2007,29(3):61-65. 被引量:13
  • 3Kelly DW, Kelly BD. A novel diagnostic sign of hip fracture mechanism in ground level falls: two case reports and review of the literature[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2012,6:136.
  • 4Bhandari M, Chiavaras M, Ayeni O, et al. Assessment of radiographic fracture healing in patients with operatively treated femoral neck fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2013,27(9):e213-e219.
  • 5Weil Y A, Safran O, Greenberg A, et al. Outcome of proximal femoral fractures caused by cycling in the young and mid-aged[J]. Injury, 2014, 45(8):1251-1255.
  • 6Mendez A A, Eyster R L. Displaced nonunion stress fracture of the femoral neck treated with internal fixation and bone graft. A case report and review of the literature[J]. Am J Sports Med, 1992, 20(2):230-233.
  • 7Kambic R E, Roberts T J, Gatesy S M. Long-axis rotation: a missing degree of freedom in avian bipedal locomotion[J]. J Exp Biol, 2014, 217(Pt 15):2770-2782.
  • 8Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities[J]. J Biomech, 2001, 34(7):859-871.
  • 9Palm H, Gosvig K, Krasheninnikoff M, et al. A new measurement for posterior tilt predicts reoperation in undisplaced femoral neck fractures: 113 consecutive patients treated by internal fixation and followed for 1 year[J]. Acta Orthop, 2009, 80(3):303-307.
  • 10Zlowodzki M, Brink O, Switzer J, et al. The effect of shortening and varus collapse of the femoral neck on function after fixation of intracapsular fracture of the hip: a multi-centre cohort study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(11):1487-1494.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部