期刊文献+

生物膜包裹残端预防胰腺远端切除术后胰漏的实验研究 被引量:3

Bovine pericardium wrapping pancreatic stump for prevention of pancreatic leak after distalpancreatectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨猪胰腺远端切除后牛心包生物膜包裹残端对术后胰漏的预防作用,评价该材料在胰腺手术中应用的安全性及可行性。方法小型猪32只随机分成对照组(n=16)与实验组(n=16),2组均接受胰腺远端切除手术,对照组远端胰腺切除后采用传统的单纯手工缝合法,实验组则先用牛心包生物膜包裹住胰腺残端,用同样缝线穿过被裹住的胰腺组织后手工缝合;测定各组术后每日腹腔引流量及引流液淀粉酶水平至术后第10天,判断胰漏情况;术后3周处死动物,观察腹内情况并取残端胰腺组织作病理学检查。结果实验组胰漏率低于对照组(6.2%比46.7%,P〈0.05),术后引流量实验组低于对照组(25.1ml比54.2ml,P〈0.01),术后3周剖腹探查,两组实验动物未见明显差异;胰腺残端组织病理结果两组均显示炎症细胞浸润并伴有少许坏死组织。结论胰腺远端切除术后,利用牛心包生物膜包裹残端后缝合可有效减少术后胰漏的发生,是安全可行的。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bovine pericardium wrapping stump after distal pancreatectomy in a porcine model. Methods Thirty-two swine were randomly assigned to control group (n = 16, conventional scalpel transection with hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant) and experiment group (n = 16, bovine pericardium wrapping stump combined with hand-sewn). Closed- suction drainage was collected daily until the tenth postoperative day. Animals were killed for necropsy at 3 weeks postoperatively and the pancreatic remnant was sampled for histology. Results The incidence of pancreatic leak in the wrapping group was lower than that in the control group (6. 2 vs. 46. 7%, P 〈0. 05). The amount of drainage fluid was higher in the control group during the postoperative period ( 25. 1 ml vs. 54. 2 ml,P 〈0. 01 ). There were no differences in operative time or other clinical parameters measured. No other significant differences were found in macroscopic changes between the two groups. Histology demonstrated focal, chronic inflammation with necrosis at the stump in all animals. Conclusions Bovine pericardium wrapping stump effectively reduced the incidence of pancreatic leakage after distal pancreatectomy.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期48-51,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胰腺切除术 生物膜 牛心包 胰腺瘘 Pancreatectomy Biofilms Bovine pericardium Pancreatic fistula
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1[1]Takeuchi K,Tsuzuki Y,Ando T,Sekihara M,Hara T,Kori T,Nakajima H,Kuwano H.Distal pancreatectomy:is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 2003; 73:922-925
  • 2[2]Sheehan MK,Beck K,Creech S,Pickleman J,Aranha GV.Distal pancreatectomy:does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 2002; 68:264-267; discussion 267-268
  • 3[3]Sledzianowski JF,Duffas JP,Muscari F,Suc B,Fourtanier F.Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy.Surgery 2005; 137:180-185
  • 4[4]Balzano G,Zerbi A,Cristallo M,Di Carlo V.The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy:the benefit of cautious drain management.J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9:837-842
  • 5[5]Bassi C,Dervenis C,Butturini G,Fingerhut A,Yeo C,Izbicki J,Neoptolemos J,Sarr M,Traverso W,Buchler M.Postoperative pancreatic fistula:an international study group (ISGPF)definition.Surgery 2005; 138:8-13
  • 6[6]Fernandez-del Castillo C,Rattner DW,Warshaw AL.Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s.Arch Surg 1995;130:295-299; discussion 299-300
  • 7[7]Bilimoria MM,Cormier JN,Mun Y,Lee JE,Evans DB,Pisters PW.Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation.Br J Surg 2003; 90:190-196
  • 8[8]Sugo H,Mikami Y,Matsumoto F,Tsumura H,Watanabe Y,Futagawa S.Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel versus conventional division for the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2001; 8:349-352
  • 9[9]Fahy BN,Frey CF,Ho HS,Beckett L,Bold RJ.Morbidity,mortality,and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.Am J Surg 2002; 183:237-241
  • 10[10]Balcom JH 4th,Rattner DW,Warshaw AL,Chang Y,Fernandez-del Castillo C.Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections:changing indications,older patients,and decreasing length of hospitalization.Arch Surg 2001; 136:391-398

共引文献24

同被引文献46

  • 1刘颖斌,朱锦辉,王建伟,方河清,李江涛,刘付宝,薛建锋,王许安,蔡炜龙,王俊,彭淑牖.三种不同胰肠吻合术可靠性比较的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(5):339-343. 被引量:22
  • 2陈孝平,张志伟,张必翔,陈义发,黄志勇,张万广,江斌,裘法祖.双“U”形贯穿缝合法行胰腺-空肠端端套入式吻合[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(5):355-356. 被引量:32
  • 3陈焕伟,甄作均,苏树英.空肠套入式胰肠吻合在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2007,13(6):418-419. 被引量:5
  • 4Kah Heng CA, Salleh I, San TS, et al. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: incidence, risk faetors and management [J]. ANZ J Surg,2010,80(9) :619-623.
  • 5Reeh M, Nentwich MF, Bogoevski D, et al. High surgical mor- bidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem [J]. World J Surg,2011,35(5) :1110-1117.
  • 6Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions [ J ]. Dig Surg,2004,21 ( 1 ) :54-59.
  • 7Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlu- sion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdomi- hal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective random-ized trial J ]. Ann Surg,2003,237 ( 1 ) :57-65.
  • 8Waiters DM, Stoke JB, Adams RB, et al. Use of a faleiform liga- ment pediele flap to decrease pancreatic fistula after distal pancrea- tectomy J]. Pancreas,2011,40(4) :595-599.
  • 9Bassi C,Dervenis C,Butturini G,et al.Postoperative pancreatic fistula:an international study group (ISGPF) definition.Surgery,2005,138:8-13.
  • 10Mezhir JJ.Management of complications following pancreatic resection:an evidence-based approach.J Surg Oncol,2013,107:58-66.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部