医学院校理工类课程作业质量调查与分析

Homework Investigation and Analysis on Science and Engineering Curriculum in Medical Schools

目的:全面了解医学院校学生对理工类课程的作业完成质量。调查研究学生在耗费时间,独立完成情况,未能独立完成的原因,完成作业热情,完成作业动力,学习价值感,共5个方面的情况。方法:设计调查问卷,重点获得学生对待作业的态度,抄袭作业的情况及其原因方面的数据。问卷采用选择题的方式,每题要求受访者分别针对语言类课程、医学类课程、理工类课程作答,采用无记名方式收集数据,由于数据总体分布未知,因此采用SPSS软件中的非参数检验进行数据统计分析,根据样本情况不同采用了Friedman检验,Mann-Whitney U检验,和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:数据分析包括两方面:相较其它学科的作业情况分析,除学科种类外的因素导致的差异分析。一方面,学科不同学生作业的抄袭频率,作业完成方式,作业价值感有显著差异(p<0.05),相对医学和语言类课程,理工类课程作业的抄袭频率更高,作业完成方式独立性更差,但价值感更强。同时,批改作业对高质量完成作业能起到极大的督促作用。另一方面,从对待作业的态度和抄袭作业的频率来评价分析,性别不同不会导致作业质量差异显著(p>0.05),而年级不同,兴趣不同会导致作业质量差异显著(p<0.05)。结论:根据数据分析结果,提出三点建议提高医学院校的理工科作业质量:改进收作业方式,尽量批改作业;采用科学的作业布置策略;结合课堂教学提高学生兴趣。

Objective： To investigate how well assignment from Science and engineering courses m mealcat performing as a whole. Five aspects of homework were covered in the research, which includs the time students spend on their homework, the extent they finish it by themselves, the cause they did not finish on their own, the passion and the primary impetus students do their homework, and the sense of achievement after that. Methods： A questionnaire was designed to collect data anonymously, which laid its emphasis on the issues comprising students attitude towards their homework, frequency, severity and reasons of homework plagiarism. A series of multiple choice questions were set in the questionnaire. Respondents were asked to answer every question for different types of courses, including medical courses, language courses, science and engineering courses. For the unknown of the distribution of population, nonparametric tests were done by SPSS software. Friedman test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were used according to different kinds of sanaples.Results： Data analysis consists of two parts： analysis on the quality of homework form science and engineering courses in comparison to other types of comics, and variance analysis on factors excluding courses. On the one hand, the analyses indicated significant difference （p 〈0.05） among different subjects in the frequency of plagiarism, the way of finishing homework, the sense of achievement. The first two items mentioned above were worse than medical and language courses, while the last item was better. And in the meantime, if students were asked to hand in their assignment in time for the teachers to correct, it would be very effective to improve the quality of their homework. On the other hand, different grades and interests also leading to significantdifference （p〈0.05）based on the statistics of the attitude and the frequency of plagiarism. Conclusions： Three pieces of tentative suggestions were proposed aimed at higher quality of homework from science and engineering courses in medical schools based on the results of data analysis. First, revise the way students submitting their homework, and try to correct them as many as possible; Secondly, adopt scientific and effective methods to assign homework; Thirdly, live up a lesson to arouse students＇ interest in learning science and engineering courses by varies teaching methods in class.