期刊文献+

n-HA/PA66 Cage在腰椎融合术中的生物安全性研究 被引量:1

The Applied Biology Safety of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with n-HA/PA66 Cage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价新型纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66融合器(nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66Cage,n-HA/PA66Cage)植入人体内可能引起的全身毒性反应及对人体局部组织的影响。方法 2012年2月至2012年4月将n-HA/PA66Cage通过腰椎后路经椎间孔进行腰椎椎体融合植入20例患者体内,通过对研究对象检查术前、术后4d、术后2个月等3个时期的血压、脉搏、体温、免疫球蛋白A、G、M、补体C3、C4、谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶、肌酐、尿素、白细胞、红细胞、血红蛋白、血小板、C反应蛋白、血沉、局部反应等指标。结果 n-HA/PA66Cage植入人体后,除了术后4d白细胞、红细胞、血红蛋白、血小板等血常规、C反应蛋白、血沉等检查与术前相比,存在统计学差异(P<0.05);在不同时相,其他检查结果之间无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论新型n-HA/PA66Cage具有良好的生物安全性。 Objective To investigate the toxic reaction on the whole body and the local tissue stimulation reaction induced by the nano hydroapatite crystals and polyamide composite(n-HA/PA66). Methods n-HA/PA66 Cages were planted into twenty patients with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion from February to April, 2012,blood press, pluse, temperature, IgA, IgG, IgM, C3, C4, ALT, AST, Cr, BUN, WBC, RBC, Hb, PLT, CRP, ESR and local reaction were measured from the twenty patients in preoperation,four days and two weeks after the operation. Results After n-HA/PA66 Cage implantation .there were the significant different between preoperation and four days after operation in the WBC,RBC,Hb,PLT,CRP,ESR. there were no significant different among the other observed data in the differ ent points(P〉0. 05). Conclusion The new type n HA/PA66 Cage has the good biosecurity.
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2013年第1期38-40,共3页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
关键词 n-HA PA66 CAGE 生物安全性 腰椎融合器 腰椎融合术 n-HA/PA66 cage biosafety lumbar fusion cage lumbar fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献65

共引文献47

同被引文献17

  • 1沈茂荣,杨渊,李鼎斌,梁伟国,余文君,韦文武.Cage椎体融合器在腰椎手术中的应用[J].广西医学,2005,27(12):2026-2027. 被引量:1
  • 2陈之白,周良安,王义生,詹世强.腰椎滑脱症的回顾与治疗新进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(3):167-169. 被引量:36
  • 3郭钧,王岩,陈仲强,刘保卫,杨民,白金柱.前路与后路腰椎间盘切除后Cage植入治疗与射频治疗改善椎间盘源性下腰痛的效果比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(12):2205-2208. 被引量:4
  • 4Herkowitz HN. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: evolution of suncal management. Spine J. 2009;9(7):605-606.
  • 5Kim S, Mortaz Hedjri S, Coyte PC, et al. Costutility of lumbar decompression with or without fusion for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2012; 12(1 ):44-54.
  • 6Dohzono S, Matsmnura A,Terai H,et al. Radiographic evaluation of postoperative bone regrowth after microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neumsurg Spine. 2013.18(5-:472 -478.
  • 7Helenius I, Lamberg T, Ostrman K, et al. Posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in young patients: a long-term evaluation using the Socliosis Research Society questionnaire. Spine. 2006;31:190-196.
  • 8Mihara H, Onari K, Cheng BC, et al. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Spine. 2003;28(3): 235-238.
  • 9McAfee PC, DeVine JG, Chaput CD, et al. indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: analysis of 120 cases. Spine. 2005;30(6 Suppl):S60-65.
  • 10DeWald CG, Vartabedian JE, Rodts MF, et al. Evaluation and management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in adults. Spine 2005;30(6Suppl):S49-59.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部