期刊文献+

中国非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征抗凝治疗多中心观察研究 被引量:5

Anticoagulants for the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in China:a multi-center observational study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中国非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)抗凝治疗策略,为改善NSTE-ACS患者预后提供依据。方法以2009年12月至2011年12月中国14个省市的28家三级医院收治的1502例NSTE-ACS患者为受试对象,各中心自行决定诊疗策略,分析和比较受试对象的治疗用药、介入治疗、术后第9天和第30天的疗效终点和安全终点的发生情况等。结果不稳定型心绞痛(UA)组主要疗效终点事件和主要安全终点事件的发生率均显著低于非ST段抬高心肌梗死(NSTE-MI)组(P<0.05);普通肝素、低分子肝素和磺达肝癸钠的应用率分别为0.61%、66.42%和30.61%;介入治疗比例为69.64%;单纯用药比例为70.74%。结论 UA与NSTE-MI相比,预后较优,严重程度较低,两种分型的转归具有差异,但治疗方案无差异,在临床治疗中应当引起重视;中国当前NSTE-ACS的抗凝治疗以低分子肝素为主,多采用单纯用药、介入治疗。 Objective To assess the anticoagulation treatment for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) in China and to offer rationale for establishing reasonable strategies to improve the prognosis of NSTE-ACS. Methods A total of 1502 patients with NSTE-ACS were recruited from different research centers in China. The strategies for diagnosis and treatment depended on researchers' decision in respective center, for further analysis and comparison on medicine care, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) therapy and end-points for efficacy and safety assessment at days 9 and 30 following PCI. Results A higher incidence rate ( P 〈 0. 05 ) was noted for efficacy and safety in patients with unstable angina (UA) than those with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-MI). The rate of prescription was 0. 61% ,66. 42% ,30. 61% ,69. 64% and 70. 74% for unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight hcparin (LM- WH) ,fondaparinux, PCI and pure medication ,respectively. Conclusion Compared with NSTE-MI, UA is featured by preferable prognosis and minor disease severity. The difference in treatment protocol, but not in the prognosis, was significant between the two phenotypes and warrants physicians' alert. The treatment of NSTE-ACS should be mainly based on LMWH, with pure medication and PCI as major adjuvant therapeutic approaches.
出处 《中国实用内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期134-137,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine
关键词 急性冠状动脉综合征 抗凝 不稳定型心绞痛 ST段抬高 心肌梗死 acute coronary syndrome anticoagulant unstable angina ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献82

  • 1李小鹰.阿司匹林在动脉硬化性心血管疾病中的临床应用:中国专家共识(2005)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):281-284. 被引量:193
  • 2康德英.Meta分析在临床研究中的应用[A].王家良 主编.临床流行病学:第2版[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002.307-325.
  • 3Hirsh J,Guyatt G,Albers GW,et al.Executive summary:American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition).2008,Chest,133:71S-109S.
  • 4Turpie AG,Bauer KA,Eriksson BI,et al.Fondaparinux vs enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery:a meta-analysis of 4 randomized double-blind studies.Arch Intern Med,2002,162:1833-1840.
  • 5Eriksson BI,Lassen MR.Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with fondaparinux after hip fracture surgery:a multicenter,randomized,placebo-controlled,double-blind study.Arch Intern Med,2003,163:1337-1342.
  • 6Turpie A,Bauer K,Caprini J,et al.Fondaparinux combined with intermittent pneumatic compression vs.intermittent pneumatic compression alone for prevention of venous thromboembolism after abdominal surgery:a randomized,double-blind comparison.J Thromb Haemost,2007,5:1854-1861.
  • 7Buller HR,Davidson BL,Decousus H,et al.Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism.N Engl J Med,2003,349:1695-1702.
  • 8Sculpher MJ,Lozano-Ortega G,Sambrook J,et al.Fondaparinux versus Enoxaparin in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes; short-term cost and long-term cost-effectiveness using data from the fifth organization to assess strategies in acute ischemic syndromes investigators (OASIS-5) trial.Am Heart J,2009,157:845-852.
  • 9Karthikeyan G,Mehta SR,Eikelboom JW.Fondaparinux in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes:evidence from OASIS 5 and 6.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2009,7:241-249.
  • 10Joyner CD,Peters RJ,Afzal R,et al.Fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation:outcomes and treatment effect across different levels of risk.Am Heart J,2009,157:502-508.

共引文献2195

同被引文献57

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部