期刊文献+

贝伐单抗在乳腺癌治疗中的疗效和风险评估 被引量:1

Benefit-risk Evaluation of Bevacizumab in the treatment of Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来贝伐单抗在乳腺癌治疗中备受争议。尽管E2100研究结果提示贝伐单抗联合化疗能使无进展生存期(PFS)提高一倍,但是之后的其他研究并没有重复该试验结果,各个独立研究和荟萃分析提示贝伐单抗联合化疗方案不能提高总生存期(OS)。美国FDA于2011年11月以贝伐单抗未能延长转移性乳腺癌患者的总生存期为理由撤销了其乳腺癌适应症的许可。另外,使用贝伐单抗可能发生严重的不良反应,如高血压、充血性心力衰竭和血栓等。因此,在全球范围内使用该药物需考虑其效价比,并对疗效和风险进行重新评估。未来的研究方向是以生物标记为基础,以筛选出能从贝伐单抗治疗中获益的乳腺癌人群。 Recently, bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced breast cancer is controver- sial. Although the E2100 had doubled the pro- gression-free survival when bevacizumab was added to chemotherapy, this magnitude of bene- fit could not be replicated in subsequent studies. Furthermore, individual studies and meta-analy- ses failed to demonstrate an overall survival ben- efit with the addition of bevacizumab to different chemotherapy regimens. The US FDA has with- drawn the approval of bevacizumab as a thera- peutic option for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in November, 2011; because that it cannot prolong the overall survival time. in addition, this agent is associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events such as hypertension, congestive heart failure and thromboembolism, and its cost is likely to be a consideration in its use worldwide. Reevaluation of the benefit-versus-risk is indispensable. Bio- marker-based studies aiming to identify the sub- population of patients most likely to benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemo- therapy in breast cancer should be a research pri- ority in future.
机构地区 浙江省肿瘤医院
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2013年第1期115-120,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 2011年省医药卫生平台重点资助计划(2011RCB009)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 血管内皮细胞生长因子 贝伐单抗 疗效 风险 Breast tumor Vascular endo- thelial growth factor Bevaeizumab Benefit Risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis:therapeutic implications[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1971,(21):1182-1186.
  • 2Ortholan C,Durivault J,Hannoun Levi JM. Bevacizumab/docetaxel association is more efficient than docetaxel alone in reducing breast and prostate cancer cell growth:a new paradigm for understanding the therapeutic effect of combined treatment[J].European Journal of Cancer,2010,(16):3022-3036.
  • 3Sweeney CJ,Miller KD,Sissons SE. The antiangiogenic property of docetaxel is synergistic with a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor or 2 methoxyestradiol but antagonized by endothelial growth factors[J].Cancer Research,2001,(08):3369-3372.
  • 4Cobleigh MA,Langmuir VK,Sledge GW. A phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer[J].Seminars in Oncology,2003,(5 Suppl 16):117-124.
  • 5Miller K,Wang M,Gralow J. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2007,(26):2666-2676.
  • 6Gray R,Bhattacharya S,Bowden C. Independent review of E2100:a phase Ⅲ trial of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2009,(30):4966-4972.doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6630.
  • 7Miles DW,Chan A,Dirix LY. Phase Ⅲ study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2010,(20):3239-3247.
  • 8Robert NJ,Dieras V,Glaspy J. RIBBON-1:randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,phase Ⅲ trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative,locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2011.1252-1260.
  • 9Allison M. Avastin's commercial march suffers setback[J].Nature Biotechnology,2010,(09):879-880.
  • 10US Food and Drug Administration,US Department of Health and Human Services. Postmarket drug safety information for patients and providers:Avastin (bevacizumab) information[OL].http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatients andProviders/UCM193900,.

同被引文献47

  • 1刘勇,汤光宇,顾伟中.动态增强MRI对乳腺癌血管生成的评价[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2005,28(6):413-416. 被引量:12
  • 2Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study[J]. JAMA, 2006, 295(21): 2492-2502.
  • 3Lurid M], Butler EN, Bumpers HL, et al. High prevalence of triple- negative tumors in an urban cancer center[J]. Cancer, 2008, 113(3): 608-615.
  • 4Reis-Filho JS, Tutt A. Triple negative tumours: a critical review[J]. Histopathology, 2008, 52(1): 108-118.
  • 5Yoon JK, Kim DH, Koo JS. Implications of differences in expression of sarcosine metabolism-related proteins according to the molecular subtype of breast cancer[J]. J Transl Med, 2014, 12: 149.
  • 6Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(8): 1275-1281.
  • 7Millar EK, Graham PH, O'toole SA, et al. Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel[J]. I Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(28): 4701-4708.
  • 8Solin LJ, Hwang WT, Vapiwala N. Outcome after breast conservation treatment with radiation for women with triple- negative early-stage invasive breast carcinoma[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2009, 9(2): 96-100.
  • 9Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, et al. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(10): 1684-1691.
  • 10Rakha EA, EI-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2007, 109(1): 25-32.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部