期刊文献+

主动脉夹层腔内隔绝术后Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器的临床应用 被引量:5

Clinical application of Perclose ProGlide suture homeostasis device after endovascular graft exclusion for aortic dissection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价经皮股动脉穿刺完成主动脉夹层(aortic dissection,AD)腔内隔绝术(endovascular graft exclusion,EVGE)后应用Perclose ProGlide(Abbott,USA)血管缝合器止血的安全性和可靠性。方法:2004-2012年我院收治的200例Stanford B型AD患者,根据在局麻或者全麻下完成主动脉EVGE随机分组。100例为对照组,经外科纵行切开腹股沟区皮肤4.0~6.0 cm,暴露股动脉2.0~3.0 cm后穿刺建立股动脉建立入路完成手术。100例为观察组,经皮股动脉穿刺建立股动脉入路完成手术,术后常规使用2套装置缝合血管。结果:观察组使用两套缝合装置成功率95.0%(95/100)。对照组和观察组手术时间分别为(113.0±16.0)min和(90.0±12.1)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。其中建立股动脉入路的时间分别为(14.0±1.3)min和(4.3±0.8)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),退鞘后股动脉处理时间分别为(8.9±1.3)min和(3.0±0.7)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),术后制动时间分别为(18.5±1.9)h和(7.7±2.3)h,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),术后平均住院时间分别为(5.2±1.0)d和(3.3±0.8)d,差异有具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。并发症发生率分别为5.0%和4.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),伤口不适感分别为36例(36.0%)和17例(17.0%),差别有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:AD EVGE后应用Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器止血是一种安全、可靠的止血方法,可以缩短手术时间、建立股动脉入路的时间、术毕股动脉处理时间、术后制动时间、术后平均住院时间且并发症少,值得进一步推广。 Objective:To evaluate the safety and reliability of applying Perclose ProGlide suture homeostasis device(Abbott,USA)after percutaneous femoral artery puncture and endovascular graft exclusion(EVGE)for aortic dissection.Methods:Totally 200 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection from 2004 to 2012 in our hospital were enrolled and were randomized into control group(n=100) and observation group(n=100) according to EVGE for aortic dissection under local anesthesia or general anesthesia.Skin in inguinal region of patients in control group was longitudinally incised 4.0-6.0 cm and was exposed 2.0-3.0 cm;femoral artery puncture was performed soon to establish femoral artery path.Patients in observation group underwent femoral artery puncture to establish femoral artery path and two sets of Perclose ProGlide devices were conventionally used after the operation.Results:Success rate of two sets of Perclose ProGlide suture devices in observation group was 95.0%(95/100).Operation time in control group and observation group was(113.0±16.0) min and(90.0±12.1) min respectively,with significant statistical differences(P〈0.01).Femoral artery path establishment time was(14.0±1.3)min and(4.3±0.8)min respectively,with significant statistical differences(P0.01).Vascular processing time after exiting the sheath was(8.9±1.3)min and(3.0±0.7)min respectively,with significant statistical differences(P0.01).Postoperative braking time was(18.5±1.9)h and(7.7±2.3)h respectively,with significant statistical differences (P0.01).Postoperative average hospitalization time was(5.2± 1.0)d and(3.3 ± 0.8)d respectively,with significant statistical differences(P0.01).Complications incidences were 5% and 4% respectively,without statistically differences(P〈0.05).Wound discomfort was respectively observed in 36 cases(36.0%) and 17 cases(17.0%),with significant statistically differences(P〈0.01).Conclusions:Clinical application of the Perclose ProGlide suture hemostasis device after EVGE for aortic dissection is a safe and reliable method,which can reduce operation time,femoral artery path establishment time,vascular processing time after exiting the sheath,brake time,postoperative hospitalization time with low complication incidences.
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期64-67,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
基金 重庆市科技攻关计划资助项目(编号:CSTC 2009AB5196) 军队临床高新技术重点资助项目(编号:2010gxjs071)
关键词 主动脉夹层 腔内隔绝术 PERCLOSE ProGlide aortic dissection endovascular graft exclusion Perclose ProGlide
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1张军,袁琛,李英肖,王彦山,李洪稳,韩立宪,元柏民,齐晓勇.冠状动脉介入诊疗术后Perclose血管缝合器的应用研究[J].临床荟萃,2007,22(6):410-411. 被引量:5
  • 2WA Lee,MP Brown,PR Nelson.Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair using the Perclose technique[].Journal of Vascular Surgery.2008
  • 3Parsa CJ,Williams JB,Bhattacharya SD,Wolfe WG,Daneshmand MA,McCann RL,Hughes GC.Midterm results with thoracic endovascular aorticrepair for chronic type B aortic dissection with associated aneurysm[].Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2011
  • 4CY Shim,S Park,YG Ko.Percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in endovascular stent-graft treatment of aortic disease[].International Journal of Cardiology.2008
  • 5Lee WA,Brown MP,Nelson PR,Huber TS.Total percutaneousaccess for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair ("Preclose"technique)[].Journal of Vascular Surgery.2007
  • 6Jahnke T,Sch fer JP,Charalambous N,et al.Total percutaneous en-dovascular aneurysm repair with the dual 6-F Perclose-AT preclosingtechnique:a case-control study[].Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.2009
  • 7Malkawi A H,Hinchliffe R J,Holt P J,et al.Percutaneous accessfor endovascular aneurysm repair:a systematic review[].Eur J Vasc En-dovasc Surg.2010

二级参考文献5

  • 1张斌,许辉,余小平,李晓苏,郭丽君.血管缝合器的临床使用价值[J].中国循环杂志,2004,19(4):273-275. 被引量:7
  • 2[1]Sprouse LR,Botta DM,Hamilton IN.The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture mediated closure devices[J].J Vasc Surg,2001,33(4):688-693.
  • 3[3]Zorger N,Finkenzeller T,Lenhart M,et al.Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device following carotid artery stenting under clopidogrel platelet blockade[J].Eur Radiol,2004,14(4):719-722.
  • 4[4]Nasu K,Tsuchikane E,Sumitsuji S,et al.The safety and efficacy of "pre-closure" utilizing the Closer suture-mediated vascular closure device for achievement of hemostasis in patients following coronary interventions:results of the second Perclose Accelerated Ambulation and Discharge (PARADISE Ⅱ) Trial[J].Invasive Cardiol,2005,17(1):30-33.
  • 5[5]Kornowski R,Brandes S,Teplitsky I,et al.Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions:a pilot evaluation[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2002,14(12):741-745.

共引文献4

同被引文献39

  • 1张军,袁琛,李英肖,王彦山,李洪稳,韩立宪,元柏民,齐晓勇.冠状动脉介入诊疗术后Perclose血管缝合器的应用研究[J].临床荟萃,2007,22(6):410-411. 被引量:5
  • 2胡雪烈,陶谦民.Perclose血管缝合器在冠心病介入治疗中的应用[J].浙江医学,2007,29(5):461-462. 被引量:13
  • 3Malkawi AH, Hinehliffe R J, Hoh PJ, et al. Pereutaneous access for endovaseular aneurysm repair, systematic review [J]. Eur J Vase Endovase Surg,2010,39(6) :676 -682.
  • 4Ramponi F, Yah TD, Vallely MP, et al. Total percutaneous car- diopulmonary bypass with Perclose Pro Glide[J]. Interactive Car- diovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2011, 13(1): 86-88.
  • 5Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. Comparison of en- dovaseular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with ab- dominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mor- tality results: randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2004, 364 (9437): 843-848.
  • 6Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et ah Outcomes fol- lowing endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial[J]. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medi- cal Association, 2009, 302(14): 1535-1542.
  • 7Zorger N, Finkenzeller T, Lenhart M, et al. Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device following carotid artery stenting under clopidogrel platelet blockade[J]. European radiology, 2004, 14(4): 719-722.
  • 8Malkawi AH, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, et al. Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review[J]. Euro- pean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: the Official Journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2010, 39(6): 676-682.
  • 9Watelet J, Gallot JC, Thomas P, et al. Percutaneous repair of aortic aneurysms: a prospective study of suture-mediated closure devices[J]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2006, 32(3): 261-265.
  • 10Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, et al. Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair us- ing the Preclose technique[J]. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2008, 47(5): 919-923.

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部