4Melissa R.Gleiberman.From Fast Cars to Fast Food:Overbroad Protection of Product Protection Trade Dress Under Section43(a)of the Lanham Act[].StanRev.
3Unfair Competition and the Doctrine of Functionality[J]. Colum. L. Rev., 1964(64):551-552.
4Deborah J. Krieger. The Broad Sweep of Aesthetic Functionality: A Threat to Trademark Protection of Aesthetic Product Features [J].Fordham Law Review, 1982(51):345.
5U. Suthersanen. The European Court of Justice in Philips v. Remington Trade Marks and Market Freedom[J].IPQ, 2003:257-283.
6David Lange. Recognizing the Public Domain[J]. Law & Contemp. Prob, 1981(44):151.
7M. Harriman. Aesthetic Functionality: The Disarray among Modem Courts[J]. Trademark Rep., 1996(86):276.
8Joel W. Reese. Defining the Elements of Trade Dress Infringement Under Section 43 (a) of the Lanham Act[J]. Tex, Intell. Prop. L.J., 1994(2): 115-121.
9Peter E. Minas. Promotional Goods and the Functionality Doctrine: An Economic Model of Trademarks[J]. TEX. L. REV., 1984(63):639,644- 647.
10M. Wong. The Aesthetic Functionality Doctrine and The Law of Trade Dress Protection [J]. ComeU L. Rev., 1998(83):1140.
