期刊文献+

甲哌卡因与利多卡因拔牙麻醉效果比较 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察甲哌卡因和盐酸利多卡因在拔牙中的临床效果,探讨口腔局部麻醉的最佳方法。方法将270例病人随机分成2组,135例采用甲哌卡因注射,另135例采用盐酸利多卡因注射,为免偏倚,由同一医师操作。对照观察2种麻醉剂的麻醉效果。结果甲哌卡因的无痛拔牙总有效率达96.7%;而盐酸利多卡因的无痛拔牙总有效率为86.4%。结论甲哌卡因的麻醉效果优于盐酸利多卡因,值得临床上推广使用。
出处 《中国中医药现代远程教育》 2012年第21期45-45,共1页 Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

  • 1綦成,张春燕,亓庆国,袁奎封.阿替卡因与利多卡因在磨牙牙髓治疗中镇痛效果的比较[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2006,16(8):468-469. 被引量:11
  • 2崔念晖.呼吸放松疗法在口腔麻醉拔牙中的抗痛虑作用[J].现代口腔医学杂志,1997,:45-45.
  • 3江明性.药理学[M] 第4版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.19.
  • 4李家泰.临床药理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.765-826.
  • 5Milam SB, Giovannitti JA Jr. Local anesthetics in dental practice[J]. Dent Clin North Am 1984 ;28(3) :493 - 508.
  • 6Guglielmo A, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Weaver J.Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% mepivacaine with 1:20000 levonordefrin[Jl. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87(3):284- 93.
  • 7Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia [ M ]. 4th edition. St. Louis : Mosby, 1997:63-64
  • 8Malamde SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCI and lidocaine HCI in pediatric dental patients [J]. Pediatr Dent,2000,22(4) :307-311
  • 9邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学[M].第4版,北京人民卫生出版社,2000:20.
  • 10Meechan JG, Parry G, Rattray DT, et al. The evaluation of the changes in blood pressure and pulse rate of hypertensive patients during tooth extraction[J]. Br Dent J,2002,192(3):161-163.

共引文献60

同被引文献27

  • 1Malamed S F,Gagnon S,Leblane D.A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental paients[J].Peleiatr Dent,2001,22(4):307.
  • 2Krzemi fi ski TF, Gilowski L, Wiench R, et al. Comparison of ropivacaine and articaine with epinephrine for infiltration anaes- thesia in dentistry-a randomized study[J]. International Endodontic Journal, 2011, 44(8): 746-751.
  • 3Ernberg M, Kopp S. Ropivacaine for dental anesthesia: a dose-finding study[J]. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2002, 60(9): 1004-1010.
  • 4Bhargava D, Chakravorty N, Rethish E, et al. Comparative analy- sis of the anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in surgical removal of impactedmandibular third molars [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2014, 13(4): 431-434.
  • 5E1-Sharrawy E, Yagiela JA. Anesthetic efficacy of different ropi- vacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block[J]. Anaes- thesia Progress, 2006, 53(1): 3-7.
  • 6Milam SB, Giovannitti JA. Local anesthetics in dental practice[J]. Dent Clin Noah Am, 1984, 28(3): 493-508.
  • 7Brkovic BM, Zlatkovie M, Jovanovic D, et al. Maxillary infiltra- tion anaesthesia by ropivaeaine for upper third molar surgery[J]. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofaeial Surgery, 2010, 39(1): 36-41.
  • 8Mansour NA, A1-Mahdy F, Abdel-Monem MT, et al. Ropiva- eaine versus bupivaeaine in postoperative pain control [J]. Biotechnol Biomater, 2012, 2(4): 1-7.
  • 9Li M, Wan L, Mei W, et al. Update on the clinical utility and practical use of ropivacaine in Chinese patients[J]. Drug Design Development and Therapy, 2014, 8(12): 1269-1276.
  • 10Michelle Franz-Montan,André L. R. Silva,Karina Cogo,Cristiane de C. Bergamaschi,Maria C.Volpato,José Ranali,Eneida de Paula,Francisco C. Groppo,胥亮(译),岳云(校).脂质体包裹罗哌卡因在人口腔粘膜表面麻醉中的应用[J].麻醉与镇痛,2008,4(4):80-84. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部